MARTIN v. BANNISTER.

(1933) 47 Ll.L.Rep. 270

COURT OF APPEAL.

Before Lord Hanworth (Master of the Rolls), Lord Justice Lawrence and Lord Justice Romer.

Motor insurance-Practice-Stay of action for personal injuries brought by plaintiff against defendant - Alleged compromise of claim-Defendant insured with P Company-Compromise of plaintiff's claim against defendant effected by C acting on behalf of plaintiff-Authority of C-Following receipt signed by plaintiff: "Received from [defendant] per the [P Company] the sum of £100 in full satisfaction and discharge of all claims made or to be made in respect to injuries and/or damage or injurious results accrued or likely to accrue in consequence of an accident which happened to me on the 25th day of September, 1932"-Payment of 35 guineas (increased on demand by C from 30 guineas) costs to C-Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925, Sect. 41