Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter
Cargill U.K. Ltd. v. Continental U.K. Ltd. - Q.B.D. (Com.Ct.) (Evans J.) - 10 May 1988
Whether f.o.b. buyer can lawfully substitute a different vessel after nomination
The parties entered into an f.o.b. sale contract which incorporated the General Conditions in GAFTA form 79A. The agreement
provided that delivery was to be between 5/31 August 1986 without extension, and that the vessel was to present notice of
readiness “latest 16 00 hours on the last business day of the delivery period having complied with all the requirements of
the nomination clause”.