Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter
D/S A/S Idaho v. Colossus Maritime S.A. (The Concordia Fjord) - Q.B.D. (Com.Ct.) (Bingham J.) - 15 December 1983
Vessel ordered to unsafe port - Whether charterers relieved of liability on ground that charterparty required them to pay additional insurance premiums in respect of extra war risks
It will be recalled that in
The Evia (No. 2)
[1982] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 307 the House of Lords held,
inter alia
, that clause 21 of the Baltime form operated as a complete code so that even though (apart from clause 21) the charterers
might be in breach of the clause 2 safe port promise, nevertheless clause 21 when read with clause 2 threw upon the owners
and their insurers all risks of unsafety which arose from the dangers of the nature referred to in clause 21(A) and thus freed
the charterers from liability for them. Lord Roskill, who gave the leading speech, had said,
inter alia
: