Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter
The Owners of “The Mineral Dampier” v The Owners of “The Hanjin Madras” - Court of Appeal (Lord Phillips MR, Schiemann and Clarke LJJ) - 31 July 2001
Collision action - Challenge to Judge’s apportionment of liability - Whether both vessels were at fault in failing to avoid a close quarters situation developing - Effect of VHF agreement
On 22 June 1995 the bulk carriers
Mineral Dampier
and
Hanjin Madras
collided in the East China Sea. The
Mineral Dampier
sank and all 27 of her crew were lost. At collision the heading of the
Hanjin Madras
was 226 degrees true and the heading of the
Mineral Dampier
was 356 degrees true. During the 30 minute period before the collision the visibility was never less than 3 miles and the
vessels came into sight of one another at that distance. It was common ground that until the vessels were 3 miles apart, although
visibility was about 3 miles, they were navigating in restricted visibility within the meaning of rule 19 of the collision
regulations.