- Home/Publications/Lloyd's Shipping & Trade Law
Cross-undertaking in damages for ship arrest: an opportunity missed
The recent decision of Teare J in Natwest Markets plc v Stallion Eight Shipping Co
SA (MV Alkyon) [2018] EWHC 2033 (Admlty) highlights, yet again, the fundamental
injustice of English law concerning the arrest of ships. Sir Bernard Eder
raises this issue again in light of this judgment.
Online Published Date:
16 October 2018
Appeared in issue:
Vol 18 No 7 - 01 September 2018
The Renos – a Trojan Horse in the LOF citadel?
In Connect Shipping Inc and Another v Sveriges
Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) and Others (The Renos) [2018]
EWCA Civ 230; [2018] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 285, the Court of Appeal ruled that SCOPIC
expenditure could be included in ascertaining whether a casualty was a
constructive total loss.
Online Published Date:
16 October 2018
Appeared in issue:
Vol 18 No 7 - 01 September 2018
Navig8 Chemicals Pool Inc v Glencore Agriculture BV (The “Songa Winds”) [2018] EWCA Civ 1901
Terms of letter of indemnityThe facts
Under a pool agreement dated 27 November 2013, Songa Winds, which was an oil and
chemical tanker, was time-chartered to Navig8, on time-charter terms based on
an amended Shelltime 4 form.
Online Published Date:
16 October 2018
Appeared in issue:
Vol 18 No 7 - 01 September 2018