i-law

Money Laundering Bulletin

The end of the beginning
Timon Molloy, Editor
Online Published Date:  05 December 2011
Appeared in issue:  189 - 05 December 2011
Derrick ponders… Mina's minutes
Which crimes can result in a Suspicious Activity Report? Derrick Paterson discusses indirect benefits and whose suspicion it is that is reported to SOCA.
Online Published Date:  05 December 2011
Appeared in issue:  189 - 05 December 2011
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) – practical steps to efficient compliance
The US is ramping up its efforts torecover tax from those liable to pay and foreign financial institutions with a US footprint must cooperate in identifying the evaders or face 30% withholding tax on US-sourced income. Combing the customer base for US taxpayers is no small task but it breaks down into clear, manageable actions, says Dr Tony Wicks, Director of AML Solutions at NICE Actimize.
Online Published Date:  05 December 2011
Appeared in issue:  189 - 05 December 2011
Through a glass, darkly
Timon Molloy, Editor (timon.molloy@informa.com).
Online Published Date:  05 December 2011
Appeared in issue:  189 - 05 December 2011
'Storm clouds' ahead for the MLRO?
Cloud computing means sunny smiles from IT procurement and management but benefits are usually attended by costs. Michael Hyland of MHA tests the latest technological weather for AML.
Online Published Date:  05 December 2011
Appeared in issue:  189 - 05 December 2011
Board directors or bored directors?
The C-suite – does the ‘C’ stand for ‘Cussed’? It is a descriptor that many an MLRO would attach to senior managers, especially when advised that they need to attend AML/CFT training. Sue Grossey offers tips on how to handle this class of bright but difficult students.
Online Published Date:  05 December 2011
Appeared in issue:  189 - 05 December 2011
I spy money – no you don't!
Intelligence agencies are, by definition, secretive. So, too, are their budgets and how they finance covert activity, especially in foreign jurisdictions and where they carry out so-called ‘black ops’. If spies use techniques to quietly transfer funds that resemble the practices of organised crime or terrorist groups, there is one major difference, writes Paul Cochrane: the sometimes tacit cooperation between government agencies and the financial sector.
Online Published Date:  05 December 2011
Appeared in issue:  189 - 05 December 2011
European recovery – it's on the way
Asset recovery is regarded, increasingly, as an important law enforcement tool in Europe, writes Alan Osborn, with techniques becoming more sophisticated and integrated with prosecutions and investigations. The fundamental approach here is not new. ‘Go after the money’ has been a commonplace of law enforcement in the financial sector since at least the time of Al Capone. But there has undoubtedly been a sharp awakening of interest in the concept since around 2000 following the successful crackdown on organised crime in Ireland through the use of unexplained wealth orders (UWO) and a string of high profile prosecutions of Mafia figures in Italy using a similar approach. “Mafia members are prepared to spend time in prison, but to take their assets is to really harm these individuals,” the leading anti-Mafia prosecutor Raffaele Grassi, vice director of the Italian National Police told an Australian parliamentary committee in 2009.
Online Published Date:  05 December 2011
Appeared in issue:  189 - 05 December 2011
Questionable sources in Russia
Liquidity constraints threaten to drive Russian businesses to seek finance from the criminal sector. Eugene Vorotnikov in St Petersburg assesses the risk
Online Published Date:  05 December 2011
Appeared in issue:  189 - 05 December 2011
No crime no bar to civil recovery
The Supreme Court has ruled that, following an acquittal in criminal proceedings, it is not a breach of the defendant’s right to a fair trial for a civil recovery order to be made using the civil rather than criminal standard of proof. The court also ruled that the investigation costs of interim receivers in such cases are, in principle, recoverable as costs of and incidental to the civil recovery proceedings. Accordingly, such costs are, in principle, recoverable from the subject of the civil recovery order. Henry Garfield and Tim Pountain-Hole of Baker & McKenzie step through the decision.
Online Published Date:  05 December 2011
Appeared in issue:  189 - 05 December 2011

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.