- Home/Publications/Lloyd's Law Reports Plus
KALLANG SHIPPING SA PANAMA v AXA ASSURANCES SENEGAL AND ANOTHER (THE “KALLANG” (NO 2))
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 1
SOTRADE DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET AS v AMADOU LO AND OTHERS (THE “DUDEN”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 2
CITY OF LONDON v SANCHETI
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 3
CMA CGM SA v HYUNDAI MIPO DOCKYARD CO LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 4
CLUB CRUISE ENTERTAINMENT AND TRAVELLING SERVICES EUROPE BV v THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT (THE “VAN GOGH”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 5
MIDDLE EASTERN OIL LLC v NATIONAL BANK OF ABU DHABI
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 6
PRATT v AIGAION INSURANCE CO SA
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 7
METVALE LTD AND ANOTHER v MONSANTO INTERNATIONAL SARL AND OTHERS (THE “MSC NAPOLI”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 8
A TURTLE OFFSHORE SA AND ANOTHER v SUPERIOR TRADING INC (THE “A TURTLE”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 9
VAN DER GIESSEN-DE-NOORD SHIPBUIILDING DIVISION BV v IMTECH MARINE & OFFSHORE BV
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 10
BARCLAY v BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 11
NOTE ASM SHIPPING LTD OF INDIA v TTMI LTD OF ENGLAND (THE “AMER ENERGY”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 12
EMMOTT v MICHAEL WILSON & PARTNERS LTD (NO 2)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 13
TRI-MG INTRA ASIA AIRLINES v NORSE AIR CHARTER LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 14
GREENLAND BANK LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) v AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 15
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v MANTERFIELD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 16
TRUSTEES OF EDMOND STERN SETTLEMENT v LEVY (T/A SIMON LEVY ASSOCIATES) (NO 2)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 17
SHAH AND ANOTHER v HSBC PRIVATE BANK (UK) LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 18
BULKHAUL LTD v RHODIA ORGANIQUE FINE LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 19
LAROCHE v SPIRIT OF ADVENTURE (UK) LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 20
WALLENTIN-HERMANN v ALITALIA-LINEE AEREE ITALIANE SPA
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 21
HARLEY AND OTHERS v SMITH AND ANOTHER
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 22
PORT OF TILBURY (LONDON) LTD v STORA ENSO TRANSPORT & DISTRIBUTION LTD AND ANOTHER
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 23
NML CAPITAL LTD v REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 24
ALLIANZ SPA AND ANOTHER v WEST TANKERS INC (THE “FRONT COMOR”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 25
STOCZNIA GDYNIA SA v GEARBULK HOLDINGS LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 26
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES v HELLENIC REPUBLIC
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 27
NATIONWIDE BUILDING SOCIETY v DUNLOP HAYWARDS LTD AND ANOTHER
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 28
IMAGEVIEW MANAGEMENT LTD v JACK
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 29
DHL GBS (UK) LTD v FALLIMENTO FINMATICA SPA
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 30
BULK & METAL TRANSPORT (UK) LLP v VOC BULK ULTRA HANDYMAX POOL LLC (THE “VOC GALLANT”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 31
F LTD v M LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 32
YOUELL AND OTHERS v LA REUNION AERIENNE AND OTHERS
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 33
NOVUS AVIATION LTD v ONUR AIR TASIMACILIK AS
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 34
KENT TRADE AND FINANCE INC AND OTHERS v JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AND ANOTHER (THE “LANNER”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 35
MAPLE LEAF MACRO VOLATILITY MASTER FUND AND ANOTHER v ROUVROY AND ANOTHER
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 36
HATZL AND ANOTHER v XL INSURANCE CO LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 37
ASSOCIATED BRITISH PORTS v FERRYWAYS NV AND ANOTHER
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 38
NATIONAL NAVIGATION CO v ENDESA GENERACION SA (THE “WADI SUDR”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 39
GAMBAZZI V DAIMLERCHRYSLER CANADA INC AND ANOTHER
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 40
LANSAT SHIPPING CO LTD v GLENCORE GRAIN BV (THE “PARAGON”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 41
SEMEN v DEUTSCHE TAMOIL GMBH
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 42
DADOURIAN GROUP INTERNATIONAL INC v SIMMS AND OTHERS
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 43
COLOUR QUEST LTD AND OTHERS v TOTAL DOWNSTREAM UK PLC AND OTHERS
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 44
TS LINES LTD v DELPHIS NV DELPHIS NV v ULRIKE F KAI FREESE GMBH & CO KG (THE “TS SINGAPORE”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 45
TRIDENT TURBOPROP (DUBLIN) LTD v FIRST FLIGHT COURIERS LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 46
GLOBAL PROCESS SYTEMS INC AND ANOTHER v SYARIKAT TAKAFUL MALAYSIA BERHAD (THE “CENDOR MOPU”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 47
DEUTSCHE BANK AG AND ANOTHER v HIGHLAND CRUSADER OFFSHORE PARTNERS LP AND OTHERS
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 48
WESTBROOK RESOURCES LTD v GLOBE METALLURGICAL INC
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 49
DOLPHIN MARITIME & AVIATION SERVICES LTD v SVERIGES ANGFARTYGS ASSURANS FORENING
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 50
BRAVE BULK TRANSPORT LTD v SPOT ON SHIPPING LTD ZHANGGANG SHIPPING LTD v BRAVE BULK TRANSPORT LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 51
JONES v CHURCHER AND ANOTHER
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 52
Banking - Money mistakenly transferred to defendant's account by claimant - Defendant's bank alerted to mistake - Defendant withdrawing money - Whether claimant had restitutionary action for money paid by mistake - Change of position - Whether defendant's bank had defence of ministerial receipt - Whether defendant's bank guilty of breach of trust.
IMT SHIPPING AND CHARTERING GMBH v CHANSUNG SHIPPING CO LTD (THE “ZENOVIA”)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 53
SHARAB v AL-SAUD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 54
Jurisdiction - Claim for commission for agency in aircraft sale - Whether good arguable case - Whether England and Wales clearly the appropriate forum - CPR Part 6.20(5) and (6) - Whether undertaking by defendant to submit to a foreign jurisdiction should be accepted.
BUNGE SA v ADM DO BRASIL LTDA AND OTHERS (THE 'DARYA RADHE')
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 55
Carriage by sea - Dangerous cargo - Shippers' liability - Cargo of soya bean meal pellets alleged to have contained rats when loaded onto vessel - Whether cargo dangerous - Whether arbitrators erred in concluding that carrier was unable to prove that any particular shipper had been responsible for introducing a rat - Hague Rules, article IV, rule 6.
RE KAUPTHING SINGER AND FRIEDLANDER LTD NEWCASTLE BUILDING SOCIETY v MILL AND OTHERS
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 56
DURHAM TEES VALLEY AIRPORT LTD v BMIBABY LTD AND ANOTHER
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 57
THE "WD FAIRWAY"
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 58
Insurance (marine) - Vessel becoming constructive total loss - Insurers not accepting notice of abandonment but making payment for constructive total loss - Vessel sold by assured to third party before all of insurers had decided to take over the vessel - Effect of sale - Rights of insurers - Applicable law - Marine Insurance Act 1906, sections 62, 63 and 79.
TASMAN ORIENT LINE CV v NEW ZEALAND CHINA CLAYS AND OTHERS (THE "TASMAN PIONEER")
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 59
Carriage by sea - Deck cargo damaged following vessel's grounding - Master failing to alert authorities of grounding and instructing crew to lie about incident - Whether carrier in breach of contract of carriage - Whether carrier entitled to rely on exemption of negligence in navigation or management of ship - Hague-Visby Rules, article IV, rule 2(a).
BERGHOFF TRADING LTD AND OTHERS v SWINBROOK DEVELOPMENTS LTD AND OTHERS [2009] EWCA Civ 413
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 60
Loan agreement - Joint venture - Construction - Partner in joint venture paying off loan from proceeds of sale of joint venture - Whether joint venture required to indemnify paying partner - Whether Resolution bound joint venture to provide indemnity.
KARAFARIN BANK v MANSOURY-DARA
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 61
Jurisdiction - Application for a stay of English proceedings - Concurrent proceedings in Iran - Abuse of process - Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, section 34.
SAGAL (TRADING AS BUNZ UK) v ATELIER BUNZ GMBH
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 62
Agency - Whether agent was 'commercial agent' - Whether claimant entitled to compensation for termination of agency agreement - Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993, Regulations 2 and 17.
UBS AG v HSH NORDBANK AG
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 63
Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Defendant domiciled in an EU member state - Whether exclusive jurisdiction agreement covered the dispute - Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001, article 23.
GEORGE v COASTAL MARINE 2004 LTD (THE "BON AMI")
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 64
Contract - Implied term - Tort - Occupier's liability - Owner of wooden vessel contracting with wharfinger to moor vessel alongside tidal berth - Vessel grounding hollow and sustaining damage - Whether mooring contract contained implied warranty of safety - Whether wharfinger gave sufficient warning of danger - Whether claimant willingly accepted risk of grounding hollow - Whether wharfinger liable - Occupier's Liability Act 1957, sections 2(2), 2(4) and 2(5).
THE "ASIA STAR"
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 65
Damages - Mitigation - Charterers unable to load cargo within agreed shipment period by reason of vessel's delay and unsuitability to receive cargo - Charterers claiming loss of profits and damages in respect of cargo not shipped or delayed shipment - Whether charterers suffered loss - Whether charterers reasonably mitigated their loss - Measure of damages recoverable.
INTERNET BROADCASTING CORPORATION LTD AND ANOTHER v MAR LLC
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 66
Contract for supply of internet television channel - Construction of exemption clause - Defendant wrongfully terminated - Contract contained exemption clause excluding liability - Whether clause capable of excluding liability for personal wrongdoing.
WEBSTER THOMPSON LTD v J G PEARS (NEWARK) LTD OMEGA PROTEINS LTD (THIRD PARTY) NORTHERN COUNTIES MEAT LTD (FOURTH PARTY)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 67
Sale of goods - Breach - Satisfactory quality - Reasonably fit for purpose - Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, section 4(2), (5) - Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994 - Evidence - Value of hearsay evidence - Damages.
TRM COPY CENTRES (UK) LTD AND OTHERS v LANWALL SERVICES LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 68
Bailment - Inducing breach of contract - Claimant supplied photocopying machines - Defendant persuaded customers to use its machines - Whether defendant guilty of tort of inducing breach of contract - Whether claimant's agreements were terminable by notice by reason of being consumer hire agreements - Consumer Credit Act 1974, section 15.
SHASHOUA AND OTHERS v SHARMA
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 69
Arbitration - Parties agreeing that venue of arbitration should be England - Whether parties agreeing that seat of arbitration should be in England - Anti-suit injunction - Whether English court retained jurisdiction to grant relief - Arbitration Act 1996, sections 3, 44 and 60 - Supreme Court Act 1981, section 37 - New York Convention 1958, article II(3).
EDO CORPORATION v ULTRA ELECTRONICS LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 70
Arbitration - Allegation of breach of contract involving use of confidential information - Application to court for pre-action disclosure - Whether court had jurisdiction to grant application - Arbitration Act 1996, sections 9 and 44 - Supreme Court Act 1981, section 33(2) - Civil Procedure Rules, Part 31.16.
MIDGULF INTERNATIONAL LTD v GROUPE CHIMICHE TUNISIEN
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 71
Practice - Anti-suit injunction - Disputes arising under contract for sale of sulphur - Dispute as to whether contract contained London arbitration clause - Defendant bringing proceedings in Tunisia - Claimants applying for interim anti-suit injunction - Whether injunction should be granted - Whether claimant had established sufficiently high degree of probability that contract contained London arbitration clause.
MANSEL OIL LTD AND ANOTHER v TROON STORAGE TANKERS SA (THE "AILSA CRAIG")
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 72
Charterparty (Time) - Shelltime 4 form - Charterers cancelling charter on basis that vessel not delivered - Whether charterers obliged to nominate delivery port prior to cancelling date - Time for making nomination.
(THE "WD FAIRWAY") (NO 3)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 73
Insurance (marine) - Vessel becoming constructive total loss - Insurers rejecting notice of abandonment but paying for constructive total loss - Vessel sold by assured to associated company at undervalue - Insurers thereafter asserting right of salvage - Whether insurers had opted to waive salvage rights - Law applicable to proprietary effects of transfer - Renvoi - Insolvency Act 1986, section 423
VITOL SA v CONOIL PLC
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 74
Sale of goods - Agreements for sale of gasoil to be delivered by ship-to-ship transfer - Buyer failing to take up cargo - Whether binding contract concluded - Whether provision of letter of credit condition precedent to enforceability of contract - Damages - Whether "Delay Penalty Clause" enforceable by seller - Whether existence of demurrage provision disabled seller from recovering damages for buyer's failure to lift cargo on time - Whether seller entitled to damages for storing cargo not taken up.
MASRI v CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS INTERNATIONAL CO SAL AND OTHERS
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 75
Practice - Judgment - Enforcement - Non-party - Judgment creditor applying for order requiring officer of judgment debtor company to attend court and provide information - Officer resident out of jurisdiction - Whether court had jurisdiction to make order - CPR 71.2 and 6.30(2).
THE "PEARL OF JEBEL ALI" AND THE "PRIDE OF AL SALAM 95"
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 76
Collision action - Vessels colliding in Suez Canal - Whether counterclaim subject to two-year limitation period - Whether court should extend time for making counterclaim - Merchant Shipping Act 1995, sections 190(3) and 190(5).
WASA INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE CO AGF INSURANCE LTD v LEXINGTON INSURANCE CO
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 77
Reinsurance – Facultative policy – Insurers covering liability against pollution losses for three-year period – Reinsurance taken out on same terms and conditions for 36 months – US courts ruling that insurers were liable for losses going back many years – Whether reinsurers liable to indemnify reinsured – Back-to-back cover – Meaning of deductible clause.
STONE & ROLLS LTD v MOORE STEPHENS
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 78
Negligence - Auditors acting negligently in failing to notice that company was defrauding creditors - Action by company's liquidators - Whether ex turpi causa rule precluded action - Whether actions of sole shareholder were attributed to company - Scope of rule in In re Hampshire Land Co [1896] 2 Ch 743.
UR POWER GMBH v KUOK OILS AND GRAINS PTE LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 79
Arbitration - Dispute as to whether parties had entered into agreement - Jurisdiction - Substantial irregularity - Error of law - Whether obligation to open a letter of credit was a condition precedent to the making of a contract of sale - Separability of arbitration clause - Time limits for application to court under two-tier arbitration - Whether time should be extended - Arbitration Act 1996, sections 7, 30, 67, 68, 69, 70 and 80(3).
COWDEN AND ANOTHER v BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 80
Carriage by air - Montreal Convention - Loss of and delay to luggage - Whether claimants entitled to damages for distress and inconvenience - Meaning of "damage" - Montreal Convention, articles 17 and 19.
KG BOMINFLOT BUNKERGESELLSCHAFT FUR MINERALOLE MBH & CO KG v PETROPLUS MARKETING AG (THE "MERCINI LADY")
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 81
Sale of goods (fob) - Contract for sale of gasoil - Cargo conforming with specification on shipment but failing to conform at discharge - Whether contract contained implied term that goods would be of satisfactory quality following a normal voyage - Sale of Goods Act 1979, sections 14(2) and 14(3).
MATRIX EUROPE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) AND ANOTHER v UNISERVE NORTHERN LTD AND ANOTHER (NO 2)
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 82
Carriage of goods by road – Sub-bailment – Freight forwarder contracting to carry cargo of mobile telephone adaptors from shipper’s premises to airport and thence by air to Hong Kong – Subcontractor mistakenly delivering goods to third party’s premises near airport – Third party accepting goods as sub-bailee – Goods stolen the following day – Shipper bringing proceedings against third party and freight forwarder – Whether third party failed to exercise reasonable care – Whether failure to exercise reasonable care caused shipper’s loss – Whether BIFA terms applied – Whether third party entitled to indemnity from freight forwarder.
PETROPLUS MARKETING AG v SHELL TRADING INTERNATIONAL LTD (THE "NINAE")
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 83
Sale of goods (fob) - Contract for sale of high sulphur fuel oil - Price based on Platts quotation for bill of lading date - Contract providing for payment in full without deduction - Delay in shipment caused by sellers' breach of contract - Market price of oil increasing between last contractual shipment date and actual shipment date - Whether sellers precluded from recovering increase in price caused by delay in shipment - Whether sellers seeking to rely on own wrong.
HIGHLAND CRUSADER OFFSHORE PARTNERS LP AND OTHERS v DEUTSCHE BANK AG AND ANOTHER
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 84
Jurisdiction - Non-exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of England - Respondent commencing proceedings in Texas - Applicant commencing proceedings in England - Whether anti-suit injunction should be granted.
PAPAS OLIO JSC v GRAINS & FOURRAGES SA AND ANOTHER
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 85
Arbitration - FOSFA - Appeal against award to be made within 42 days - Whether award sent to appellant's correct address so as to trigger running of time - FOSFA, rules 6, 7 and 11.
MEDITERRANEAN SALVAGE & TOWAGE LTD v SEAMAR TRADING & COMMERCE INC (THE "REBORN")
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 86
Charterparty (Voyage) - Specific load port named in voyage charter - Port containing several berths to which vessel could be directed to load - Vessel sustaining damage while berthing -Whether charterparty containing implied term that charterers must nominate safe berth.
COMMERCIAL MARINE & PILING LTD v PIERSE CONTRACTING LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 87
Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Guarantee - Irish company guaranteeing debt owed in England - Whether obligation in question to be performed in England - English law applicable to guarantee - Debtor required to seek out creditor - Rome Convention 1980, article 4.2 and 4.5 - Council Regulation EC (No) 44/2001, article 5.
ACCENTUATE LTD v ASIGRA INC
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 88
Arbitration - Agency - Agreement governed by Ontario law - Obligation to go to arbitration in Ontario - Arbitrators applying Ontario law and dismissing agent's claim for compensation - Whether arbitration clause binding - Permission for service outside the jurisdiction - Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993, Regulations 17 and 19 - CPR 6.20.
THE SHIPPING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD v JALDHI OVERSEAS PTE LTD (THE "RISHIKESH")
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 89
Admiralty practice - Maritime attachment - Jurisdiction - Attachment of electronic fund transfers in intermediary bank - Whether funds "defendant's ... property" - Whether funds subject to maritime attachment - Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, Rule B.
LANSAT SHIPPING CO LTD v GLENCORE GRAIN BV (THE "PARAGON")
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 90
Charterparty (Time) - Late redelivery - Charterparty clause providing that in event of late redelivery charterers will pay market rate of hire from 30th day before contractual redelivery date until actual redelivery - Whether clause a penalty.
ENVIROCO LTD v FARSTAD SUPPLY A/S (THE "FAR SERVICE")
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 91
Charterparty - Exemption clause allocating insurable risk between shipowners and charterers and their "Affiliates" - Vessel sustaining fire damage during cleaning of oil tanks by service company related to charterers - Whether service company entitled to benefit of exemption clause on basis that it was an "Affiliate" of charterers - Companies Act 1985, sections 736(1)(c) and 736A(7).
SHELL EGYPT WEST MANZALA GMBH AND ANOTHER v DANA GAS EGYPT LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 92
Arbitration - Error of law - Application for permission to appeal - Arbitration agreement stating that award was to be "final, conclusive and binding" - Whether parties had excluded right of appeal - Arbitration Act 1996, section 69.
COMPANIA SUD AMERICANA DE VAPORES SA v SINOCHEM TIANJIN IMPORT AND EXPORT CORPORATION (THE "ACONCAGUA")
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 93
Carriage by sea - Dangerous cargo - Explosion of cargo of calcium hypochlorite in container - Cargo stowed near bunker tank - Crew heating bunker tank during voyage - Charterers settling claim brought by shipowners - Whether charterers entitled to indemnity from shippers - Whether charterers ought to have known that cargo was dangerous - Whether heating of bunker tank causative of explosion - Meaning of requirement to stow dangerous cargo "away from" source of heat - Whether charterers in breach of seaworthiness obligation - Whether loss arose from excepted peril - Hague Rules article IV, rule 6 and article IV, rule 2(a).
INTA NAVIGATION LTD AND ANOTHER v RANCH INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 94
Sale of ship - Right of first refusal - MOA on Norwegian Sale Form terms - Buyers agreeing to purchase newbuilding vessel with right of first refusal to purchase second newbuilding vessel - Sellers giving notice to buyers of sale of second newbuilding to third party on "novation terms" - Buyers exercising right of first refusal - Whether resulting contract on Norwegian Sale Form terms or on novation terms.
ENE KOS v PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA (THE "KOS")
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 95
Charterparty (Time) - Withdrawal of vessel for non-payment of hire - Whether owners entitled to damages for detention while charterers' cargo remained on board and for consumption of bunkers - Whether owners entitled to recover as bailees - Whether owners entitled to recover expenses of providing bank guarantee - Whether "costs of or incidental to proceedings" - Supreme Court Act 1981, section 51.
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT v STAGECOACH SOUTH WESTERN TRAINS LTD
[2009] Lloyd's Rep Plus 96
Arbitration - Franchise agreement - Dispute as to whether calculation of future payments fell within arbitration clause - Arbitration Act 1996, section 72.