- Home/Publications/Lloyd's Law Reports
MARIDA LTD AND OTHERS v OSWAL STEEL AND OTHERS (THE "BIJELA")
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 1
General average - Cost of temporary repairs - Vessel grounded causing damage to bottom plating - Temporary repairs effected - General average declared - Whether owners entitled to claim contribution from cargo-owners for cost of temporary repairs - York-Antwerp Rules 1974.
NESTE CHEMICALS S.A. AND OTHERS v. D K LINE S.A. AND TOKUMARU KAIUN K.K. (THE “SARGASSO”)
Admiralty practice - Application to set aside - Jurisdiction - Carriage of goods by sea - Cargo contaminated - English and Dutch proceedings brought - Whether English Court first seised of proceedings - Whether English and Dutch proceedings involved same cause of action and between same parties - Whether English Court should decline jurisdiction and set aside writ - Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 6
PREKOOKEANSKA PLOVIDBA v. FELSTAR SHIPPING CORPORATION AND SETRAMAR Srl. AND STC SCANTRADE A.B. (THIRD PARTY) (THE “CARNIVAL”)
Negligent navigation - Damage to vessel and cargo - Plaintiffs’ vessel being moored at Setramar berth at Ravenna - Defendants’ vessel proceeded past plaintiffs’ vessel - Plaintiffs’ vessel and cargo damaged by fender penetrating plating - Whether defendants’ vessel negligently navigated - Whether plaintiffs guilty of contributory negligence - Whether plaintiffs failed to take steps to mitigate amount of damage caused.
Charter-party (Voyage) - Unsafe berth - Damage to vessel and cargo - Charterers ordered vessel to Ravenna - Vessel being moored alongside Setramar berth - Defendants’ vessel proceeded past plaintiffs’ vessel - Damage to plaintiffs’ vessel and cargo caused by fender penetrating plating - Whether Setramar berth an unsafe berth - Contribution between defendants - Civil Liability (Contribution) Act, 1978.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 14
CARIBBEAN GENERAL INSURANCE LTD v FRIZZELL INSURANCE BROKERS LTD
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 32
Practice — Discovery — “Unless” order —
Plaintiffs alleged negligence by defendants in
placing excess of loss reinsurance — Unless
order made against plaintiffs for specifi c
discovery — Plaintiffs failed to comply with
order — Whether time for compliance with
order should have been extended — Whether
judgment entered in default should be restored.
THE “VARNA” (No. 2)
Admiralty practice - Stay of action - Dispute under charter-party - Proceedings brought in Bulgaria and England - Lis alibi pendens - Whether Bulgaria more appropriate forum for trial of action - Whether English action should be stayed.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 41
DAVAL ACIERS D’USINOR ET DE SACILOR AND OTHERS v. ARMARE SRL (THE “NERANO”)
Bill of lading - Arbitration clause - Incorporation - Stay of action - Plaintiffs not charterers of vessel - Bill of lading incorporated “all terms and conditions . . . and arbitration clause of the Charterparty” - Dispute between defendants and plaintiffs - Whether bill of lading incorporated arbitration clause - Whether defendants entitled to stay action.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 50
SOKANA INDUSTRIES INC. AND OTHERS v. FREYRE & CO. INC. AND ANOTHER
Practice - Application to set aside - Dispute referred to arbitration in England - Defendants brought proceedings in Florida - Plaintiffs served originating summons out of jurisdiction - Whether plaintiffs claim for final injunctive relief within s. 12(6) - Whether service out of jurisdiction should be set aside - R.S.C., O. 73, r. 7 - Arbitration Act, 1950, s. 12(6).
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 57
GILL & DUFFUS S.A. v. RIONDA FUTURES LTD.
Sale of goods (c.i.f.) - Demurrage - Notice of readiness - Validity of documents tendered - Dispute under contract of sale - Whether buyers liable for demurrage - Whether valid notice of readiness given - Whether sellers failed to make contractual tender of documents - Whether defendants liable under contract of guarantee.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 67
THE BANK OF BARODA v. THE VYSYA BANK LTD.
Banking - Unconfirmed credit - Authorization to claim reimbursement withdrawn - Whether contract between issuing bank and confirming bank made within jurisdiction - Whether contract made by agent residing within jurisdiction - Whether Court had jurisdiction to grant leave to serve writ out of jurisdiction - R.S.C. O. 11, r. 1(1)(d).
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 87
ROADWORKS (1952) LTD. v. J. R. CHARMAN AND OTHERS
Insurance (Marine) - Non-disclosure - Leading underwriter clause - Underwriters agreed to insure barge provided LSA approved towing and beaching arrangements - LSA refused approval of beaching arrangements - Waiver of LSA condition - Whether leading underwriter as agent could waive LSA approval - Whether underwriters bound by second slip - Circuity of action - Whether plaintiffs could claim under first slip.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 99
COPPÉE-LAVALIN S.A./N.V. v. KEN-REN CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION IN KENYA). VOEST ALPINE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT v. KEN-REN CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION IN KENYA)
Arbitration - Security for costs - I.C.C. arbitration - Contract for supply of chemical plant in Kenya - Disputes to be referred to International Chamber of Commerce - Defendants in liquidation - Whether plaintiffs could apply for security for costs in I.C.C. arbitration - Arbitration Act, 1950 s. 12(6).
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 109
HUNT (NOW SEVERS) v. SEVERS
Damages - Personal injury - Nursing care - Plaintiff seriously injured in road accident as a result of defendant’s negligence - Defendant voluntarily assisted in plaintiff’s care - Whether plaintiff’s entitled to claim compensation in damages for such care as provided by defendant.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 129
COHEN AND OTHERS v. BARAM
Arbitration - Award - Costs - Order for costs made by Beth Din - Costs of arbitrators to be paid equally by parties - Whether Beth Din proper plaintiffs - Propriety of award - Whether O. 73 and Arbitration Acts applicable - Whether defendant had a valid counterclaim - R.S.C., O. 73 - Arbitration Act 1979.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 138
GULF BANK K.S.C. v. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. (No. 2)
Banking - Guarantee - Indemnity - Advance payment guarantee and counter indemnity issued in respect of supply of plant to Kuwait Ministry - Negotiations for resumption of contract after Iraq evicted from Kuwait failed - Whether defendants liable to indemnify bank for payments made by bank under payment guarantee.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 145
GUARDIAN OCEAN CARGOES LTD., TRANSORIENT SHIP CARGOES LTD., MIDDLE EAST AGENTS S.A.L. AND MED LINE S.A. v. BANCO DO BRASIL S.A. (Nos 1 and 3)
Banking - Ship finance - Negotiations between plaintiffs and bank for refinancing of vessel - Plaintiffs paid three instalments to bank - Whether moneys paid conditional on conclusion of refinancing deal - Whether plaintiffs entitled to recover moneys so paid - Whether parol evidence rule applied.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 152
CHANNEL ISLAND FERRIES LTD. v. CENARGO NAVIGATION LTD. (THE “ROZEL”)
Charter-party (Bareboat) - Redelivery - Assessment of damages - Entablature of generator repaired by charterers in course of charter - Owners alleged repairs affected class - Whether owners entitled to notional cost of replacing entablature - Correct measure of damages to be applied.
Arbitration - Award - Costs - Arbitrators ordered charterers to pay own costs and half owners’ costs of reference and costs of award to be apportioned three-fourths/one-fourth in favour of owner - Whether arbitrator had erred in awarding costs.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 161
EFFORT SHIPPING CO. LTD. v. LINDEN MANAGEMENT S.A. AND ANOTHER (THE “GIANNIS NK”)
Cargo - Dangerous cargo - Shipper’s liability - Cargo of ground-nuts shipped at Dakar infested with Khapra beetle - Cargo jettisoned at sea - Whether infestation originated in ground-nut cargo shipped under charter - Whether Khapra beetle already on board vessel when ground-nut cargo shipped - Whether cargo dangerous by reason of presence of Khapra beetle - Whether shippers’ liable - Bills of Lading Act 1855, s. 1.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 171
K/S STAMAR v. SEABOW SHIPPING LTD. (THE “ANDREAS P”)
Sale of ship - Norwegian Saleform - Alleged breaches - Buyers contended that at time of delivery vessel failed to satisfy requirements of contract - Whether items of work carried out to comply with recommendations made by classification society before vessel delivered - Whether such costs recoverable from sellers.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 183
THE LLOYD’S LITIGATION: THE MERRETT, GOODA WALKER AND FELTRIM CASES
Negligence - Duty of care - Lloyd’s litigation - Names alleged agents negligent in conducting Names’ underwriting affairs at Lloyd’s - Whether agents under duty to exercise reasonable skill and care - Whether duty extra-contractual.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 193
133. THE AGENCY AGREEMENTS BYELAW
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 211
TRIAD SHIPPING CO. v. STELLAR CHARTERING & BROKERAGE INC. (THE “ISLAND ARCHON”)
Charter-party(Time) - Indemnity - Implied term - Owners incurred loss in complying with charterers’ orders - Whether owners entitled to be indemnified by charterers for such loss - Whether term should be implied.
Arbitration - Jurisdiction - Cargo claims - Whether reference to arbitration in respect of “cargo claims” wide enough to cover claims owners wished to advance - Whether claims included claims in respect of which arbitrator refused leave to amend - Whether claims abandoned - Whether owners entitled to an indemnity from charterers.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 227
E.E. CALEDONIA LTD. (formerly OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM (CALEDONIA) LTD.) v. ORBIT VALVE CO. PLC
Contract - Construction - Indemnity clause - Contract to overhaul gas valves on Piper Alpha platform - Disastrous fire on platform - Service engineer died - Whether plaintiffs’ right to indemnity included consequences of plaintiffs’ negligence - Whether indemnity covered breach of statutory duty - Whether engineer’s death caused by performance of contract.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 239
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC UK LTD. v. ROYAL LONDON INSURANCE (UK) LTD. AND OTHERS
Insurance (Building works) - Deductible clause - Construction - Deductible of $250,000 each and every loss from any defective component part - Defect in floor of 94 toilet modules - Whether claim arose from one defective component - Whether deductible applied to each damaged module.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 249
THE “SKYRON” AND “HEL”
Collision - Passing vessels - Collision in North Sea - Both vessels partly to blame for collision - Issues as to time of collision, speed of vessels and visibility - Apportionment of blame.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 254
SA SUCRE EXPORT v. NORTHERN RIVER SHIPPING LTD. (THE “SORMOVSKIY 3068”)
Bill of lading - Misdelivery - Breach - Conversion - Delivery to Commercial Sea Port at Vyborg without production of bills of lading - Whether defendants in breach - Whether delivery in accordance with customs, practice and procedure of port - Whether CSP agent of plaintiffs under English law - Whether defendants entitled to demurrage.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 266
PARTENREEDEREI M/S “HEIDBERG” AND VEGA REEDEREI FRIEDRICH DAUBER v. GROSVENOR GRAIN AND FEED CO. LTD., UNION NATIONALE DES COOPERATIVES AGRICOLES DE CEREALES AND ASSURANCES MUTUELLES AGRICOLES (THE “HEIDBERG”)
Bill of lading - Incorporation - Arbitration clause - Vessel chartered for carriage of grain - Vessel collided with jetty and fire broke out on board - Cargo damaged - Claim by cargo interests - Whether amended Centrocon arbitration clause incorporated into bill of lading.
Conflict of laws - Proper law - Bill of lading - Incorporation of arbitration clause - Dispute between owners and cargo interests - Owners brought action in France - French Court decided arbitration clause not incorporated - Whether Court bound by Brussels Convention to recognize French decision - Whether question of incorporation to be determined by English or French law.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 287
CHILEWICH PARTNERS v. M.V. ALLIGATOR FORTUNE AND OTHERS
Bill of lading - Misdelivery - Breach - Delivery of goods to bonded warehouse without production of bills of lading - Whether carriers properly delivered goods - Whether carriers liable as bailees of goods.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 314
ALISTAIR GRAHAM JOHN BROWN v. GUARDIAN ROYAL EXCHANGE ASSURANCE PLC.
Practice - Discovery - Legal professional privilege - Insured solicitor sued for negligence - Solicitors acted for insured - Insured claimed under professional indemnity insurance - Insurers asked for discovery of solicitors’ file during period solicitors acting for insured - Whether terms on which solicitors instructed precluded insured from asserting legal professional privilege against insurers.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 325
REPUBLIC OF INDIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF DEFENCE) v. INDIA STEAMSHIP CO. LTD. (THE “INDIAN GRACE”) (No. 2)
Admiralty practice - Res judicata - Waiver - Estoppel - Carriage by sea - Damage to goods - Judgment obtained in India - Action brought in England - Whether plaintiffs’ action barred by res judicata under s. 34 - Whether defendants waived rights or were estopped from relying on s. 34-Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982 s. 34.
Admiralty practice - Actions in rem and personam - Res judicata - Carriage by sea - Damage to goods - Judgment obtained in action in personam in India - Action in rem brought in England - Whether English action barred by res judicata under s. 34 - Whether proceedings in English action brought on same cause of action between same parties as proceedings in India - Whether English proceedings should be struck out - Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982, s. 34.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 331
UNITED NATIONS/FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION-WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME v. CASPIAN NAVIGATION INC. (THE “JAY GANESH”)
Charter-party (Voyage) - Notice of readiness - Laytime - Commencement - Vessel gave notice of readiness - Vessel delayed by non-availability of berth and infestation of insects requiring fumigation - Whether notice of readiness valid - Whether shipowners entitled to claim demurrage.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 358
MARC RICH & CO. A.G. v. BEOGRADSKA PLOVIDBA (THE “AVALA”)
Arbitration - Arbitrator - Award - Error of law - Remission - Dispute under charter - Arbitrator awarded damages for detention - Arbitrator recorded as common ground that charterers not entitled to benefit of freight actually earned - Whether arbitrator erred - Whether award should be varied or remitted.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 363
CHIMIMPORT PLC v. G D’ALESIO SAS (THE “PAOLA D’ALESIO”)
Arbitration - Arbitrator - Jurisdiction - Dispute under charter referred to arbitration - Settlement agreement entered into - Whether validity of settlement agreement to be determined by arbitrator - Whether settlement agreement terminated arbitration - Whether bill of lading abrogated - Whether defendants could maintain tortious claims - Further directions - Whether arbitration void and arbitrator had no jurisdiction or power to act.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 366
BP CHEMICALS LTD. v. KINGDOM ENGINEERING (FIFE) LTD.
Arbitration - Award - Error of law - Reasons - Application to remit - Whether reasons formed part of award - Whether arbitrator erred in awarding interest - Whether award should be remitted.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 373
LEOND MARITIME INC. v. MC AMETHYST SHIPPING LTD. (THE “ANNA L”)
Practice - Writ - Application to set aside - Writ suffered from procedural difficulties - Writ issued in name of wrong plaintiffs - Service of writ effected on defendants’ managers - Whether service should stand - Whether amendment to correct name of plaintiffs should be allowed - Whether validity of writ should be extended - Whether writ and all proceedings should be set aside.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 379
GIDRXSLME SHIPPING CO. LTD. v. TANTOMAR TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS LDA.
Practice - Mareva injunction - Disclosure order - Disputes under charter referred to arbitration - Awards in favour of owners - Owners obtained Mareva injunction and disclosure order - Scope of Mareva injunction confined to assets within jurisdiction - Whether jurisdiction to order affidavit of charterers’ assets outside jurisdiction.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 392
METAL SCRAP TRADE CORPORATION v. KATE SHIPPING CO. LTD. (THE “GLADYS”) (No. 2)
Sale of ship - Binding contract - Arbitration agreement - Negotiations for sale of ship - Defendants refused to proceed with sale - Whether binding contract of sale came into existence before defendants withdrew - Whether contract contained arbitration agreement.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 402
WAHDA BANK v. ARAB BANK PLC
Conflict of law - Proper law - Performance bond, advance payment guarantee and counter guarantee given in respect of contracts for supply of equipment and spares to Libya - Claim on counter guarantee - Whether proper law of counter guarantee Libyan law - Whether defendants entitled to leave to defend - R.S.C., O. 14.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 411
RICHARD HUGHES v. VAIL BLYTH CLEWLEY (THE “SIBEN”)
Sale of yacht - Section 30 order - Discharge - Contract between plaintiff and defendant for sale of yacht - Plaintiff alleged breach of contract and misrepresentation - Plaintiff obtained order prohibiting defendant from dealing with yacht for one year - whether plaintiff mere personal creditor - whether order should be discharged - Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, s. 30.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 420
PAN ATLANTIC INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER v. PINE TOP INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Reinsurance - Non-disclosure - Misrepresentation - Renewal invited based on loss record for 1977-1979 years - Whether plaintiffs failed to disclose material facts - Whether position misrepresented - Whether additional losses for year 1980-1981 should have been disclosed - Whether reinsurers entitled to avoid policy for misrepresentation and non-disclosure.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 427
THE LLOYD’S LITIGATION: THE MERRETT, GOODA WALKER AND FELTRIM CASES
Negligence - Duty of care - Lloyd’s litigation - Names alleged agents negligent in conducting Names’ underwriting affairs at Lloyd’s - Whether agents under duty to exercise reasonable skill and care - Whether duty extra-contractual.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 468
MEDITERRANEAN FREIGHT SERVICES LTD. v. BP OIL INTERNATIONAL LTD. (THE “FIONA”)
Carriage by sea - Dangerous cargo - Unseaworthiness - Carriage of cargo of fuel oil - Explosion occurred while vessel preparing to discharge - Whether explosion occurred because fuel oil contaminated with residues from previous cargoes - Whether owners consented to shipment of dangerous cargo - Whether owners failed to exercise due diligence to make vessel seaworthy - Hague-Visby Rules, art. III, rr. 1, 2, art. IV, r. 6.
Unseaworthiness - Carriage by sea - Carriage of cargo of fuel oil - Explosion occurred while vessel preparing to discharge - Whether vessel unseaworthy - Whether owners failed to remove residues of previous condensate cargo from vessel - Whether owners failed to ensure that heating coils did not leak - Hague-Visby Rules art. III, rr. 1, 2, art. IV, r. 6.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 506
OCARINA MARINE LTD. AND OTHERS v. MARCARD STEIN & CO.
Practice - Writ - Application to set aside - Jurisdiction - Loan agreement, assignment of earnings and deed of charges entered into between German bank and Liberian shipowners - Documents contained English jurisdiction clause - Whether English Court had jurisdiction to hear action against German bank - Whether writ should be set aside - Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982, arts. 2, 5(1), 17.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 524
DET DANSKE HEDESELSKABET v. KDM INTERNATIONAL PLC
Practice - Interrogatories - Application for withdrawal - Sale of perishable goods - Dispute as to whether damage caused by inherent defect in goods or delay - Interrogatories served - Whether interrogatories properly answered - Whether application to withdraw should be granted.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 534
KUWAIT PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. I & D OIL CARRIERS LTD. (THE “HOUDA”)
Charter-party (Time) - Off-hire - Iraq invaded Kuwait - Charterers’ offices moved to London - Delay by owners in carrying out charterers’ orders - Whether vessel off hire - Whether loss of time caused by breach of charter by owners - Whether owners acted reasonably - Whether cargo could be discharged without presentation of bill of lading.
Bill of lading - Non-presentation - Delivery orders - Iraq invaded Kuwait - Time charterers ordered discharge of cargo without presentation of bills of lading - Whether order lawful - Whether owners bound to comply with order.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 541
IP METAL LTD. v. RUOTE OZ S.p.A. (No. 2)
Practice - Leave to appeal - Contract - Breach - Plaintiffs claimed damages - Defendants applied to stay action - Jurisdiction clause within art. 17 of Brussels Convention - Stay refused - Whether Judge erred - Whether leave to appeal should be granted - Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982, art. 17.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 560
C. T. BOWRING & CO. (INSURANCE) LTD. v. CORSI PARTNERS LTD.
Practice - Security for costs - Inquiry into damages - Action by plaintiffs for balance due from defendant in respect of insurance and reinsurance business - Mareva injunction discharged by consent - Defendant claimed damages under plaintiffs’ cross-undertaking in Mareva injunction - Whether order for security for costs should be made against defendants.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 567
THE “SAN NICOLAS” AND “FRATERNITY L”
Collision - Passing vessels - Liability - Collision in access channel to port of Buenos Aires - Whether either or both vessels to blame for collision - Apportionment of blame.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 582
THE “ANGELIC SPIRIT” AND “Y MARINER”
Collision - Crossing vessels - Liability - Collision off west coast of California - Alterations of course by vessels - Poor lookout - Liability for collision - Apportionment of liability.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 595
WESTLAND HELICOPTERS LTD. v. ARAB ORGANISATION FOR INDUSTRIALISATION
Practice - Garnishee nisi - Application to set aside - Arbitration award in favour of creditor - Creditor obtained garnishee orders against debtors’ deposits at banks - Whether intervenors true owners of deposits - Whether garnishee nisi orders should be set aside.
Conflict of laws - Garnishee nisi - Application to set aside - Arbitration award in favour of creditors - Creditors obtained garnishee orders against debtors’ deposits at bank - Whether interveners true owners of deposits - Whether debtors’ existence constitution and authority governed by Egyptian law - Whether proper law public international law - Whether garnishee nisi orders should be set aside.
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 608
COASTAL (BERMUDA) PETROLEUM LTD. v. VTT VULCAN PETROLEUM S.A. (No. 2) (THE “MARINE STAR”)
Sale of goods (C.i.f.) - Non-delivery - Assessment of damages - Defendants non-delivery caused plaintiffs’ breach with third party - Plaintiffs claimed loss of profits and loss of yield - Whether available market - Whether loss of profit within parties assumed contractual contemplation - Whether plaintiffs liable for loss of yield incurred by third party
[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 629