- Home/Publications/Lloyd's Law Reports
BROWN & DAVIS LTD. v. GALBRAITH
Contract - Repairs to damaged car - Whether owner or insurance company liable.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 1
KLEINJAN & HOLST N.V. ROTTERDAM v. BREMER HANDELSGESELLSCHAFT m.b.H. HAMBURG
Sale of goods (c.i.f.) - Notice of appropriation - Wrong vessel named in notice - Whether sellers entitled to amend notice - Cattle Food Trade Association (Inc.) - Contract form no. 100, clause 10.
Sale of goods (c.i.f.) - Breach of condition - Acceptance of goods by buyers - Condition reduced to level of warranty - Measure of damages - Sale of Goods Act, 1893, sects. 11 (1) (c) 53.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 11
EASTMAN CHEMICAL INTERNATIONAL A.G. v. N.M.T. TRADING LTD. AND EAGLE TRANSPORT LTD.
Carriage of goods - Goods on lorry destroyed by fire - Whether carriers liable as common carriers-Whether carriers guilty of negligence.
Carriage of goods - Exemption clause - Fundamental breach - Road Haulage Association Ltd.'s Conditions, conditions 2, 8.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 25
STEIN AND OTHERS v. THE "KATHY K" (ALSO KNOWN AS "STORM POINT") AND "S.N. No. 1", EGMONT TOWING & SORTING LTD., SHIELDS NAVIGATION LTD., HELSING AND IVERSON (THE "KATHY K")
Canada - Collision - Yacht in collision with towed barge - Yacht's crew killed - Whether tug-owner liable-Faulty look-out- Excessive speed - Failure to sound signals - Tow-rope too long - Collision Regulations, 1960, rules 12, 20, 22, 23, 29 - National Harbour Board Regulations, regulations 35 (1), 37 (1).
Canada - Limitation of liability - Collision between yacht and towed barge - "Actual fault or privity" of tug-owner - Right of tug-owner and master to limit liability - Tow-rope too long - Tug not supplied with copy of Collision Regulations, 1960 - Minimum crew not present - No whistle on flying bridge - Master insufficiently experienced - Alternative means of activating whistle not supplied - Canada Shipping Act (R.S.C. 1970, cap. S-9) sects. 647 (2), 649 (1), 651 (1).
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 36
PRACTICE DIRECTION
Estate agents' and auctioneers' remuneration - No. 11 of 1972 - No. 2 of 1972.
[1972] 2 LLOYD'S LAW REPORTS 48
LEE v. BRITISH LAW INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Insurance (Personal Accident) - Non-disclosure - Proposer suffering from myopia - Deterioration in eyesight-Cataracts discovered by specialist prior to completion of proposal form - Plaintiff not told of cataracts but advised to have pathological tests at hospital- Question in proposal form: "Has the person to be insured sustained any accidents or illnesses during the past five years", answered "No" - Declaration that proposer had "No physical defect or infirmity" - Whether insurers entitled to avoid policy and counterclaim for sums paid.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 49
PALAMISTO GENERAL ENTERPRISES S.A. v. OCEAN MARINE INSURANCE CO. LTD. (THE "DIAS")
Marine insurance - Scuttling - Loss of insured vessel - Plea by insurers that she was scuttled - Whether assured entitled to particulars of scuttling - R.S.C., Order 18, r. 8, 12, Order 72, r. 7.
Practice - Commercial Court - Pleadings - Claim for loss of ship - Scuttling alleged by insurers - Whether shipowners entitled to particulars.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 60
G.F.P. UNITS LTD. v. MONKSFIELD
Insurance (Motor) - Exception clause - "Persons or Classes of Persons entitled to drive" - Named drivers only - Car damaged while being driven by person not named in certificate of insurance - Whether car driven without owner's authority - Whether loss by theft or conversion.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 79
LARSON CONSTRUCTION CO., ET AL v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.
United States - Insurance - Stevedores' liability - Stevedores' employee injured while loading barge - Damages action settled by barge owners-Indemnity paid by stevedores- Liability of stevedores' insurers - Whether stevedores' liability "assumed under any contract or agreement" - Contra proferentem rule - Effect of clause excluding cover in respect of "bodily injury to any employee".
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 87
PRACTICE DIRECTION
Court Procedure and Court Forms - Compromises in Contentious Probate Actions.
[1972] 2 LLOYD'S LAW REPORTS 90
DRAPER AND DRAPER v. HODDER
Negligence - Animal - Child attacked by Jack Russell terriers in pack - Evidence of danger from such a pack - Liability of owner and breeder in negligence without scienter - Liability of child's parent to contribute.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 93
THORNTON v. SWAN HUNTER (SHIPBUILDERS) LTD.
Factories Act, 1961 - Unfenced machinery - Contributory negligence - Plaintiff repairing paint spraying machine - Guards removed from machine by plaintiff - Plaintiff's finger caught in "nip" - Apportionment of responsibility - Sect. 14.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 112
THE "ROSSETTI"
Bill of lading - Exception clause - "Any loss of or damage to any goods however caused which is capable of being covered by insurance" - "All exceptions . . . shall apply . . . notwithstanding unseaworthiness" - Perils and immunities - Whether owners exempted from liability for damage caused by unseaworthiness which owners had not taken all reasonable means to provide against.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 116
THE "FERDINAND RETZLAFF"
Collision - Damages for detention - Vessel damaged in collision sent to dry dock at North Shields for permanent repairs - Survey and owners' repairs done at same time - Whether temporary repairs only should have been effected - Whether permanent repairs should have been effected afloat at Bremen - Whether owners of other vessel entitled to credit for time saved in combining owners' repairs and collision repairs - Admissibility of evidence - Weight of evidence - Civil Evidence Act, 1968, sects. 2, 6 (3).
Evidence - Admissibility - Weight - Civil Evidence Act, 1968, sects. 2, 6 (3).
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 120
E. B. AABY'S REDERI A/S v. UNION OF INDIA (THE "EVJE")
Charter-party (Voyage) - Arbitration clause - Baltimore Grain Charter-party Form C - Centrocon arbitration clause incorporated - Claim barred if arbitrator not appointed within 12 months of date of final discharge - Vessel running out of fuel oil - Tug hired - Claim by shipowners for general average contribution from charterers - Undertaking by charterers to pay general average contribution "which may be legally due" - Arbitrator not appointed within time limit - Whether claim a "dispute" within arbitration clause - Whether charterers liable on undertaking - York-Antwerp Rules, 1950.
General average - Undertaking of charterers to pay - York-Antwerp Rules, 1950.
Arbitration - Appointment of arbitrator - Extension of time for appointment - Discretion of Court - No undue hardship - Arbitration Act, 1950, sect. 27.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 129
PRACTICE DIRECTION
Costs - Taxation - Taxing fees - Payment - Method of payment.
[1972] 2 LLOYD'S LAW REPORTS 140
WAYNE TANK & PUMP CO. LTD. v. EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION LTD.
Insurance (Public liability) - Proximate cause rule - Storage tank installed at plasticine mill by insured - Stearine to be pumped into tank through plastic pipe - Heating tape wrapped round pipe to keep stearine liquid - Current switched on by employee of insured - Installation left unattended - Pipe not capable of withstanding heat - Mill destroyed by fire - Exception of liability for loss "caused by nature . . . of any goods . . . sold or supplied by . . . Insured." - Whether switching on of current a novus actus interveniens - Whether insurers liable.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 141
TRADE AND TRANSPORT INC. v. IINO KAIUN KAISHA LTD. (THE "ANGELIA")
Charter-party (Voyage) - Frustration - Anticipatory breach - Cargo of phosphate rock not available at loading port due to lack of transport - Lack of transport existing at time charter made - No enquiry made by charterers - Whether charterers wholly and finally disabled from supplying and shipping cargo before expiry of frustrating time - Exception clause - Whether charterers within wording of exception clause covering "shortage of cars; wagons" and "unavoidable hindrance" - Applicability of fundamental breach doctrine - "Fosfo" form.
Arbitration - Charter-party - Frustration - Issue on whether or not a frustrating time had elapsed on facts - Whether an issue of law.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 154
DUCHESS OF ARGYLL v. BEUSELINCK
Negligence - Solicitor - Client wishing to publish memoirs - Retainer of solicitor to advise clients generally - Agreement with newspaper to publish memoirs approved by solicitor - Considerable tax liability incurred as result - Whether solicitor guilty of giving negligent advice.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 172
ASTROVLANIS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. v. LINARD (THE "GOLD SKY")
Marine insurance - Total loss of vessel - Claim against underwriter for loss by perils of the sea-Allegation of hole in engine-room plating - Scuttling alleged by underwriter - Burden of proof - Whether offer of salvage refused - Whether underwriter entitled to counterclaim under Marine Insurance Act, 1906, sect. 78 (4).
Marine insurance-Suing and labouring-Claim against underwriter for total loss of vessel - Salvage assistance refused by master and third engineer - Whether master and crew included within "assured and his agents" - Whether underwriter entitled to counterclaim - Marine Insurance Act, 1906, sects. 78 (4), 55 (2) (a), Institute Time Clauses (Hulls), clause 7.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 187
BURNETT v. BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD
Negligence - Volenti non fit injuria - Barge being towed into dock - Lighterman on barge injured by parting rope - Notice at dock entrance exempting dock owners from liability to lightermen - Negligence admitted by dock owners - Whether absolved from liability by exemption notice.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 222
LAURENCE v. DAVIES NORWICH UNION FIRE INSURANCE SOCIETY LTD. (THIRD PARTY)
Insurance (Motor) - Extent of cover - "Driving by . . . Insured of any motor car . . . not belonging to him . . ." - Insured involved in accident while driving Ford Transit van - Whether covered under policy - Contra proferentem rule - Applicability of definitions in Road Traffic Act, 1960.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 231
PETER LIND & CO. LTD. v. MERSEY DOCKS AND HARBOUR BOARD
Contract - Offer and acceptance - Tenders invited for construction of freight terminal for harbour board - Tenders at fixed price and at variable price submitted by building contractors - Rise in costs of construction - Construction work done - Whether harbour board accepted fixed price or variable price tender - Whether contractors entitled to payment on quantum meruit - I.C.E. Conditions (4th ed. 1955).
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 234
CARTWRIGHT v. G.K.N. SANKEY LTD.
Master and servant - Duty of care - Poisonous fumes inhaled by electric arc welder - Whether employers knew of danger - Medical literature on degree of danger - Whether employers liable at common law or for breach of statutory duty - Whether part of claim was statute-barred - Factories Act, 1961, sects. 4 (1), 63 (1).
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 242
IN RE COMPANIA MERABELLO SAN NICHOLAS S.A.
Company - Winding up - Unregistered Panamanian company owning one ship - Petition to wind up company brought by owners of cargo and cargo underwriters - Petition brought so that company's claims against its third-party liability insurers might be vested solely in petitioners under Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act, 1930 - Petition opposed by company's insurers - Jurisdiction of Court to make winding-up order in circumstances - Exercise of Court's discretion - Whether necessary to show that company had carried on business within jurisdiction - Whether company's claim against insurers an "asset" - Whether petitioners had a sufficient interest - Companies Act, 1948, sects. 399, 400 - Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act, 1930, sect. 1 (1).
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 268
ARNOLD MALABRE & CO. LTD. v. KINGSTON PILOTAGE AUTHORITY
Jamaica - Pilotage - Fees for pilotage services - Legislation creating separate compulsory and optional pilotage areas - Whether one pilotage fee payable in respect of pilotage within or up to optional limit and another pilotage fee in respect of pilotage within or up to compulsory limit or whether single fee payable in respect of voyage between compulsory limit and port or vice versa.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 281
GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE AND LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION LTD. v. FOSTER
Costs - Legal aid - Insurance company as unassisted party - Costs incurred in interlocutory appeal - Whether insurance company entitled to costs from legal aid fund - Whether order for costs just and equitable - Meaning of "proceedings" - Whether "finally decided in favour of unassisted party" - Legal Aid Act, 1964, sect. 1 (1), (2).
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 288
E. L. OLDENDORFF & CO. G.m.b.H. v. TRADAX EXPORT S.A. (THE "JOHANNA OLDENDORFF")
Charter-party (Voyage) - Laytime - Vessel reaching bar anchorage at Liverpool/Birkenhead - Whether vessel an "arrived ship" - Effect of words "whether in berth or not".
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 292
ZAPATA OFF-SHORE CO. v. THE "BREMEN" AND UNTERWESER REEDEREI G.M.B.H. (THE "CHAPARRAL")
United States - Towage - Towage contract providing for litigation of disputes in English Courts - Drilling barge damaged while being towed - Action for damages brought in U.S. Court by barge-owners - Tug-owners brought action for damages in English Court and action to limit liability in U.S. Court - Whether U.S. Court entitled to restrain English action and limitation action - Factors to be considered.
United States - Conffict of laws - Forum selection clause - Enforceability - Matters to be considered - Burden of proof.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 315
McMILLAN v. CROUCH
Pilotage - Unlicensed pilot - Vessel moved within London Pilotage District-Pilotage by licensed waterman not licensed as pilot - Offer by licensed pilots refused by ship's master - Whether an offence - London Pilotage District By-laws, part IX, by-law 2 -Pilotage Act, 1913, sects. 11, 30, 32.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 325
OLEARIA TIRRENA S.p.A. v. N.V. ALGEMEENE OLIEHANDEL (THE "OSTERBEK")
Sale of goods (f.o.b.)-Waive-Buyers' failure to nominate vessel by time stated in contract -Whether time of essence-Whether sellers entitled to repudiate contract and claim for storage charges - London Oil and Tallow Trades Association contract no. 43.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 341
AGRO COMPANY OF CANADA LTD. v. RICHMOND SHIPPING LTD. (THE "SIMONBURN")
Charter-party (consecutive voyage)- Centrocon arbitration clause incorporated-Arbitrator to be appointed "within 3 months of final discharge" - Vessel to perform five consecutive voyages-Damage suffered on first voyage-Three other voyages performed -Shipowner's arbitrator appointed 41 2 weeks after end of three months from completion of discharge under first voyage-Whether appointment in time.
Charter - party (consecutive voyage) - Construction - "Centrocon" arbitration clause incorporated- Difficulties caused.
Arbitration-Appointment of arbitrator- "Within 3 months of final discharge"- Whether appointment in time.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 355
COMMERCIAL BANKING CO. OF SYDNEY LTD. v. R. H. BROWN & CO.
Australia-Bank-Duty of care- Customers' financial position misrepresented in response to enquiry by another bank-Liability to customer of other bank-Effect of disclaimer notice: "Confidential and for your private use and without responsibility on the part of this bank or its officers"-Effect on damages of contractual duty on customer incurring loss to deliver goods.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 360
GOODEY AND SOUTHWOLD TRAWLERS LTD. v. GARRIOCK, MASON AND MILLGATE
Sale of ship - Deposit and purchase money paid by plaintiff to ship-broker - Vessel sold to another purchaser - Monies not recovered by plaintiff - Whether contract of sale concluded - Liability of vendor - Whether plaintiffs' rights against vendor barred by suing ship-broker - Capacity in which ship-broker received deposit - Custom of trade.
Ship-broker - Capacity in which deposit and purchase money received and held - Custom of trade.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 369
PRODEXPORT STATE COMPANY FOR FOREIGN TRADE v. E.D. & F. MAN LTD.
Arbitration - Non-speaking award - Sale of sugar f.o.b. Constanza by Rumanian sellers to English buyers - Part of sugar shipped - Shipment of all sugar later prohibited by Rumanian Government - Claim by buyers for non-delivery of remainder-Non-speaking award in favour of buyers - Application by sellers to set aside award - Whether arbitrators had jurisdiction - Alleged misconduct of arbitrators - International comity - Arbitration Act, 1950, sect. 26 - General Rules and Arbitration Rules of Sugar Association of London.
Arbitration - Procedure - Application for extension of time to appeal - Application for award to be set aside - R.S.C., Orders 3, 73.
Conflict of laws- Illegality - Sale of sugar prohibited by Rumanian Government - Claim by buyers for non-delivery - Non-speaking arbitration award in favour of buyers - Whether award could be set aside - Whether arbitrators had jurisdiction - - International comity.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 375
COMPANIA DE NAVIERA NEDELKA S.A. OF PANAMA v. TRADAX INTERNACIONAL S.A. OF PANAMA CITY R.P. (THE "TRES FLORES")
Charter-party (voyage) - Demurrage - Vessel found infested at loading port - Whether notice of readiness to load effective - Whether charterers under duty to inspect vessel - Synacomex form, clauses 6, 21.
Arbitration-Award in form of special case- Reason for making non-speaking awards.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 384
FISHER AND OTHERS v. THE "OCEANIC GRANDEUR" ROBERTS AND OTHERS v. THE "OCEANIC GRANDEUR"
Australia - Salvage - Vessel striking uncharted rock - Salved by other vessel - Salvage claim by officers and crew - Danger to salved vessel and to salvors - Voluntariness - Effect of salvage agreement between owners of two vessels - Amount of award - Factors to be considered.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 396
CENTRAL ASBESTOS CO. LTD. v. DODD
Limitation of action - Asbestosis - Claim by mill worker against employer for causing asbestosis - Whether action statute-barred - Actual or constructive knowledge of "material facts" of "decisive character" - Knowledge by workman that employers had failed to take reasonable care to prevent excess of asbestos dust which had caused disease - No knowledge by employee that, in law, those facts afforded him a good cause of action - Asbestos Industry Regulations, 1931 - Limitation Act, 1963, sect. 1 (3), 7 (3), (4), (8).1
Practice - Whether Court should look at Committee Reports when construing Act of Parliament.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 413
LONDON DREDGING CO. LTD. v. GREATER LONDON COUNCIL (THE "SIR JOSEPH RAWLINSON")
Limitation of liability - Tug and tow in common ownership - Collision with ship - Negligence on part of person in charge of tug - No negligence on part of anyone on tow - Whether relevant tonnage for limitation purposes was that of tug alone or aggregated tonnage of tug and tow - Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, sect. 503 (1) - Merchant Shipping (Liability of Shipowners and Others) Act, 1958.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 437
THE "ATLANTIC STAR"
Admiralty practice - Stay of proceedings - Lis alibi pendens - Collision in Belgium - Five actions arising out of collision pending against defendants in Antwerp Court - Whether action in rem commenced in England should be stayed - Balance of convenience - Whether action oppressive or vexatious - Whether plaintiff prejudiced or injustice to defendants-International comity-Principles on which discretion should be exercised.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 446
CLAYTON v. ALBERTSEN
Pilotage - Compulsory pilotage - Lorries and trailers carried on "roll-on, roll-off" ship - Whether drivers of lorries were "passengers" - Pilotage Act, 1913, sect. 11.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 457
TENAX STEAMSHIP CO. LTD. v. THE "BRIMNES" (OWNERS) (THE "BRIMNES")
Charter-party (time) - Hire - Withdrawal of vessel by shipowners for non-payment - Whether payment made by charterers before withdrawal - Effect of order to bank to pay - Effect of withdrawal by telex - Whether right to withdraw waived - Whether new contract arose - "Payment to be made in cash". - "Otherwise failing punctual and regular payment owners shall be at liberty to withdraw".
Banking - Transfer order - Whether receipt of order analogous to receipt of cheque.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 465
THE "MIDHURST" (OWNERS) v. THE "LAKE ATLIN" (OWNERS) (THE "LAKE ATLIN")
Practice - Collision between two vessels - Action brought by owners of one vessel - Counterclaim by owners of other vessel -Whether counterclaim should be dismissed for want of prosecution - Whether reasonable excuse - Whether plaintiffs acquiesced in delay - Whether plaintiffs prejudiced by delay - R.S.C., Order 25, r. 1.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 489
CONSOLIDATED MINING AND SMELTING COMPANY OF CANADA LTD. v. STRAITS TOWING LTD.
Canada - Bill of lading - Cargo loaded on barge towed by tug - Barges moored at booming ground and left unattended - Barges sunk and cargo damaged - Whether vessels seaworthy, properly manned and equipped - "Perils of the sea" - Whether carrier negligent - (Canadian) Carriage of Goods by Water Act (R.S.C., 1970, cap. C-15), Schedule, art. III, r. 1, art. IV, r. 2 (c).
Canada - General average expenditure - Contribution paid by cargo-owner - Carrier not negligent - Whether recoverable by cargo-owner.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 497
HENRIKSENS REDERI A/S v. T. H. Z. ROLIMPEX (THE "BREDE")
Charter-party (voyage) - Freight payable on delivery - Cargo damaged - Whether charterer could set off amount of damage against shipowner's claim for freight - Whether action statute-barred - Hague Rules, art. III, r. 6 - Limitation Act, 1939, sect. 28 - Gencon form.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 511
THE COMMERCIAL BANKING CO. OF SYDNEY LTD. v. JALSARD PTY. LTD. (TRADING AS JALSARD TRADING CO.)
Banking - Commercial credits - Letter of credit requiring "certificate of inspection" to be delivered by sellers-Certificate of surveyors tendered and accepted-Goods delivered with defects not apparent on visual inspection-Liability of bank.
Evidence - Admissibility - Bankiny - Conversation between bank and customer - Whether admissible.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 529
JAMES BUCHANAN & CO. LTD. v. HAY'S TRANSPORT SERVICES LTD. AND DUNCAN BARBOUR & SON LTD.
Carriage of goods-Loss in transit-Trailer (loaded with cases of whisky) stolen from compound-Tractor unit detached for repairs-No alarm or guard dog in compound-Whether carrier and compound owner exercised reasonable care-Whether sub-bailment to owners of compound or mere licence to park.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 535
A. M. SATTERTHWAITE & CO. LTD. v. NEW ZEALAND SHIPPING CO. LTD. (THE "EURYMEDON")
Bill of lading - Himalaya clause - Whether stevedore entitled to protection of exemption and limitation clauses in bill of lading - Whether contract between consignee and stevedore.
Contract - Consideration - Whether performance of or promise to perform an obligation already imposed on a party on a different contract is sufficient consideration to support a new contract between that party and a new party.
Stevedores - Negligence - Damage to cargo - Whether stevedores entitled to benefit of Himalaya clause in bill of lading.
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 544
LEATHER'S BEST INC. v. TIDEWATER TERMINAL INC.
United States - Carriage by sea - Loss of cargo (in container) - Limitation of carrier's liability - Validity of bill of lading clause treating container as a "package" - Whether terminal operator entitled to benefit of limitation clause in bill of lading - United States Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1936 (46 U.S. Code, sect. 1304 (5)).
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 557
J. H. MOORE & CO. v. CROWE
Insurance (Motor) - Cancellation of fleet cover by insurers - Six copies of certificate of insurance issued - Three copies not returned - Whether insurers at risk until all certificates returned - Whether insured entitled to refund under cancellation clause - Applicability of Road Traffic Act, 1960, sect. 205 (1), (4).
[1972] 2 Lloyd's Rep 563
PRACTICE DIRECTION
Court procedure - Fixing dates for trial in Witness List, Part I.
[1972] 2 LLOYD'S LAW REPORTS 566