We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

SMITH (AS ADMINISTRATOR OF COSSLETT CONTRACTORS) v BRIDGEND COUNTY BOROUGH COUNCIL

Building Law Reports

SMITH (AS ADMINISTRATOR OF COSSLETT CONTRACTORS) v BRIDGEND COUNTY BOROUGH COUNCIL

[2002] BLR 160

HOUSE OF LORDS

Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Browne-Wilkinson, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Scott of Foscote and Lord Rodger of Earlsferry

ICE Conditions 5th Edition - Clause 63(1): employer’s right to use contractor’s plant to complete contract and to sell the plant - Employer’s right constituting a floating charge requiring registration under section 395 of Companies Act 1985 - Failure to register making it void as against the administrator and company in administration - Consent of employer to removal of plant by third party amounting to the tort of conversion.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click login button.

Login