In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close

EXMAR B V v. NATIONAL IRANIAN TANKER CO. (THE “TRADE FORTITUDE”)

Lloyd's Law Reports

EXMAR B V v. NATIONAL IRANIAN TANKER CO. (THE “TRADE FORTITUDE”)

[1992] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 169

QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION(COMMERCIAL COURT)

Before His Honour Judge Diamond, Q.C. (Sitting as a Judge of the High Court)

Arbitration - Award - Interim award - Owners claimed and charterers cross-claimed for damages under charter - Owners claimed they were entitled to be paid undisputed part of their claim - Charterers contended they were entitled to rely on defence of equitable set-off - Whether arbitrators had a discretion not to make an interim award in favour of owners - Whether arbitrators erred in law in exercising that discretion.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more