We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

UNION TRANSPORT PLC. v. CONTINENTAL LINES S.A. AND CONTI LINES S.A. (TRADING AS CROSS AM LINES)

Lloyd's Law Reports

UNION TRANSPORT PLC. v. CONTINENTAL LINES S.A. AND CONTI LINES S.A. (TRADING AS CROSS AM LINES)

[1992] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 229

HOUSE OF LORDS

Before Lord Keith of Kinkel, Lord Ackner Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle and Lord Lowry

Practice - Jurisdiction - Failure to nominate vessel - Whether place of performance London - Whether action should have been brought in country of defendants’ domicile - Whether service of writ should be set aside - Whether Court had jurisdiction - Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982, Schedule 1, art. 5(1).

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more