In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close

CHRISTENSEN v. HINDUSTAN STEEL LTD.

Lloyd's Law Reports

CHRISTENSEN v. HINDUSTAN STEEL LTD.

[1971] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 395

QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION(COMMERCIAL COURT)

Before Mr. Justice Donaldson

Charter-party - Commencement of laytime - Notice of readiness to load - Whether notice stating that vessel would be ready at future date sufficient - Whether such notice an effective notice of anticipated readiness - "Gencon" form.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more