i-law

International Construction Law Review

SET-OFFS, CERTIFIED PAYMENTS AND SINGAPORE’S SECURITY OF PAYMENTS ACT 2004

DR PHILIP CHAN

Associate Professor, Department of Building, National University of Singapore

Introduction

Both English and Singapore judges have acknowledged the importance of maintaining cash-flow in respect of the survival of contractors and subcontractors in the construction industry. This article examines how a builder1 in the well-known payment arrangement scheme that is dependent on certification and found in most standard forms of building contract is deprived of payment because of the right of set-off exercised by the employer.
In this payment scheme the builder is entitled to an amount that is certified due by a designated certifier who works out the certified amount by applying the formula prescribed by the particular standard form contract that is applicable. This certified amount becomes due for payment from the employer to the builder and the amount due is usually reduced by an amount which the employer is entitled to deduct by way of a contractual provision or when the employer exercises his common law right of set-off. In the many cases brought to the courts by builders, the common ground used by employers to justify non-payment is reliance on their right of set-off, whether contractual or common law based.
This article begins by looking briefly at the issue of set-off as regards its evolution independent of the standard forms of building contract as well as in the light of how the common law right of set-off has been excluded by the Singapore Institute of Architects’ (SIA) standard form of building contract. Subsequently, the article examines how this right of set-off is regulated through the use of the legislation in the three jurisdictions of England, New South Wales and Singapore and concludes that the builder’s position cannot be better than before Singapore’s Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004 (SOPA 2004) was implemented.

The right of set-off and its evolution

Generally, there was no right of set-off under the common law against a payment claim made in court by a plaintiff before the enactment of the English set-off statutes of 1728–1734. When a payment claim was rightly


Pt 3]
Set-Offs, Certified Payments and Singapore’s Security of Payments Act

331

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.