- Home/Publications/Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter
The Forum Craftsman - Court of Appeal (Ackner & Browne-Wilkinson L.JJ. and Sir John Megaw) - 20 December 1984
The vessel Forum Craftsman
was arrested in England pursuant to a claim by plaintiff cargo owners. The plaintiffs alleged that their cargo had been damaged by the vessel’s crew as a hatch cover was being closed after completion of loading at a..
Online Published Date:
17 January 1985
Appeared in issue:
136 - 17 January 1985
The Maira - Court of Appeal (Lawton, Kerr & Browne-Wilkinson L.JJ.) - 5 December 1984
The vessel Maira
was built in Japan. In 1977 the owners paid the builders 30% of the purchase price and it was agreed that the remaining 70% should be financed on mortgage. In the event, two mortgages were entered into. The second mortgage was..
Online Published Date:
17 January 1985
Appeared in issue:
136 - 17 January 1985
Oetker v. Internationale Frachtagentur A.G. (The Almak) - Q.B.D. (Com.Ct.) (Mustill J.) - 12 December 1984
Time-charterers and disponent owners of the tank vessel Almak
sub-chartered her to IFA. Clause 26 provided that bills of lading were to be signed as the sub-charterers directed, without prejudice to the sub-charter. The sub-charterers gave the..
Online Published Date:
17 January 1985
Appeared in issue:
136 - 17 January 1985
Cardinal Shipping Corpn. v. M/S Seisho Maru - U.S. Ct. of Appeal (5th Circuit) (Goldberg, Rubin and Reavley C.JJ.) - 22 October 1984
The vessel Seisho Maru
was owned by a Japanese company and time-chartered to another Japanese company. The time-charterers (disponent owners) had the right to sub-let the vessel. They sub-time chartered the vessel to Clover Trading Corporation, a..
Online Published Date:
17 January 1985
Appeared in issue:
136 - 17 January 1985
Overseas Development Bank v. Naftali Chaim Nothmann & Ors. - New York Appellate Division (Second Department) (Titone J.P., Mangano, O’Connor and Brown JJ.) - 22 October 1984
On 25 April 1975 and 17 June 1975 judgments were given in the Queen’s Bench Division of the English High Court of Justice in favour of the plaintiff in the sum of £125,000 and £95,516.50 respectively. Nothing was done to enforce..
Online Published Date:
17 January 1985
Appeared in issue:
136 - 17 January 1985