Insights

Reflections on speed and performance claims (Part II): London and New York Arbitration

Prokopios Krikris, FCIArb, consultant and arbitrator

This article explores speed and performance claims through the lens of two major arbitral centres: London and New York. While differences exist in the publication of awards, procedural formality, and the background of arbitrators, both jurisdictions display consistency in approach and outcome.

Published 20 May 25

Settling claims under different insurance conditions: a comparative study

Adam Rolland, Average Adjuster, Independent Average Adjusters Ltd, Bjørn Slaatten, Average Adjuster, Norway and Petros Tasios, Senior Claims Executive, Seascope (Hellas) SA

This study identifies the most significant differences between the American Institute Hull Clauses (2 June 1977) and the Nordic Plan (Version 2023), and highlights the effect of such differences from the standpoint of claims handling and average adjusting.

Published 13 May 25

Charting the waters: how does maritime case law percolate to construction law?

Mathias Cheung, LLB (Hons), BCL, barrister at Atkin Chambers, Lincoln’s Inn, London

It is right to say that a construction practitioner would very rarely partake in the work of a shipping lawyer, and vice versa. However, it does not follow that construction law and maritime law are two unrelated bodies of law which do not speak to each other.

Published 11 November 24

Reflections on speed and performance claims (Part I)

Prokopios Krikris

Prokopios Krikris identifies some contentious issues that persist in speed and consumption disputes and require further consideration. His analysis focuses on recently published LMAA award commentaries and The Divinegate.

Published 25 September 23