i-law

Building Law Monthly

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH TIME LIMIT DID NOT INVALIDATE DECISION

Barnes & Elliot Ltd v Taylor Woodrow Holdings Ltd [2003] EWHC 3100 (TCC); [2004] BLR 111

In Barnes & Elliot Ltd v Taylor Woodrow Holdings Ltd [2003] EWHC 3100 (TCC); [2004] BLR 111 Judge Humphrey LLoyd QC held that the failure by an adjudicator to comply with a time limit for the giving of his decision did not of itself render the decision unenforceable. That said, the decision does not confer on an adjudicator an entitlement not to complete the decision within the time allowed. It is important to see the case in its immediate factual context. The adjudicator in the present case had written his decision within the agreed time-frame and his error was one that related to the communication of the decision to the parties. In such a case a delay of one day in reaching the decision did not invalidate the decision. In other cases the courts may not be so lenient.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2026 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.