i-law

Financial Regulation International

Global

Counting the cost of quality: Why companies not required to comply with SOX are still seeking to improve their internal controls

Since the conception of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, little has been said of its benefits, with the focus of both the board and the business media falling almost exclusively on the costs of compliance. The mounting costs of becoming Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) compliant continue to receive substantial attention: Financial Executives International reported that SOX year one total compliance costs were nearly 2.3 times original estimates. Many expect year two compliance costs to decrease. Sean Holohan, director of business risk at Protiviti, explains why companies that are not required to comply with these regulations are taking on these costs in a bid to improve their internal controls.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2026 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.