| General insurance regulation – FSA review |
April 2006 – Q1 2007 |
The regulator announced in September 2005 that it will review the effectiveness of the general insurance regulatory regime
since it was first introduced at the beginning of 2005 in line with EU requirements for intermediary regulation. The FSA will
test the benefits of the regime to consumers and the industry will get a chance to identify areas of both effectiveness and
ineffectiveness. The FSA has hinted that it will look at deregulation options for household and motor insurance. Initial findings
of the review are expected towards the end of 2006 with a final report due in the first quarter of 2007.
|
| National Audit Office review of the FSA |
July 2006 – H1 2007 |
The Treasury has commissioned the NAO to review the “economy, efficiency and effectiveness” with which the FSA carries out
its statutory duties. It will be the first time that the NAO has got its hands on the regulator and the areas due to be covered
include internal performance management, external joint working within the UK, influencing and representation internationally,
financial crime and financial capability. The NAO said it hopes to publish its findings as early as possible into 2007 and
the Treasury said it will lay the report before Parliament during the first half of 2007.
|
| Travel insurance review |
Q1 2007 |
The UK Treasury is reviewing travel insurance sold by travel agents – currently unregulated – following pressure from consumer
groups and the insurance industry to address the imbalance. A formal consultation was launched in November 2006, open until
February 2007, which listed the options as no change, strengthened self-regulation or full FSA regulation. The government
is expected to announce its decision in Q1 2007.
|
| Financial Services Practitioner Panel survey of FSA |
November 2006 |
The FSPP’s biennial survey of regulated firms got due in November. The Panel collects the views of practitioners on a range
of issues relating to the performance and effectiveness. Previous surveys have proved instrumental in influencing the FSA.
Its 2004 survey saw the costs of regulation rise to be the number one concern amongst practitioners, leading to the joint
Costs of Regulation study with the FSA (published summer 2006).
|
| EU Reinsurance Directive |
December 2006 |
The UK regulator has opted for a largely principles-based approach and has chosen not to introduce any additional options
allowed by the European Commission. It launched a consultation with the market in June which closed on 20 August 2006. The
FSA wants to have the rules in place by year-end 2006, one year before the EU transposition deadline.
|
| Client money review |
Before end 2006 |
Thematic reviews conducted in the wholesale insurance market in mid-2005 and in the retail market in late 2005 revealed a
“worrying” level of breaches of client money rules. As a result, the FSA will begin a large-scale review in both wholesale
and retail insurance before the end of this year. The FSA will visit over 200 firms looking for “significant improvement”
in compliance with client money rules.
|
| Contract certainty – challenge deadline |
By end 2006 |
The FSA issued the market with a warning in December 2004 that it would be given two years to develop a market solution to
improve contract certainty between insurers and brokers and the insured. The market is meeting regularly with the FSA but
the regulator has a plan for greater enforcement if the market fails to rise to the challenge. The market is expected to have
raised standards significantly by the end of 2006.
|
| Better Regulation Action Plan |
2006 ongoing |
A number of measures will get underway in 2006, according to the plan published in December 2005. Part of the agenda includes
consultation on simpler conduct of business rules for businesses dealing with retail customers, simplification of listing
rules, a review of the “approved persons” regulatory burden on wholesale financial markets and the first results from research
to measure and track with selected regulatory processes. An update report is due in the fourth quarter of 2006.
|
| Individual Capital Adequacy Standards (ICAS) |
2006 |
The FSA will conduct thematic work during 2006 to examine how far the ICAS regime has brought about improvements in firms’
risk management processes. The year since its introduction in November 2005. The regulator said developing individual capital
guidance to firms had taken longer than expected but that it hopes to complete the reviews over the next two years (with general
insurance reviews due to complete before end 2006). From the reviews already completed, the FSA said ICG should be given for
most of the firms reviewed at higher levels than the assessments. It also urged firms to exercise more caution in the treatment
of reinsurance credit risk and intra-group reinsurance.
|
| Contract certainty – market meeting |
January 2007 |
The FSA will meet with the market for the eighth time when it is expected to reveal whether the market has done enough to
meet the regulator’s challenge, raise standards or face regulatory intervention if progress was lacking by December 2006.
The FSA said it was not inclined to pursue regulation but warned that its plans could be resurrected at any time.
|
| Financial Ombudsman Service – funding Review |
Early 2007 consultation paper due (delayed from Autumn 2006) – April 2008 for changes to take effect (delayed from end 2006) |
A consultation paper due for release in the Autumn, following the joint discussion paper between the FOS and the FSA published
in May, has been delayed until early 2007. The FOS and FSA told firms they would restructure the fee structure to make it
fairer, Given the delay, any changes are not expected to take effect before April 2008 (the original intention was to have
changes in place by the end of 2006). On announcing the delay, the FSA and FOS said respondents to the discussion paper favoured
the more radical “new model” options that would target case fees from the firms that use the service the most. Under current
rules, firms are allowed two free cases with the FOS before paying a charge per case but under the new model proposals this
could be raised to five or 10 free cases. The FSA said it is looking at four options more closely “before the FSA can be satisfied
that it should be adopted”.
|