We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

GROVE DEVELOPMENTS LTD V S&T (UK) LTD

Construction Law Reporter

GROVE DEVELOPMENTS LTD V S&T (UK) LTD

Validity of pay less notice – Understanding of the reasonable recipient – If notice deficient, whether party issuing notice entitled to commence a separate adjudication seeking a decision as to the "true" value of the interim application

Two principal issues arose on the facts of the case. The first was whether the claimant's pay less notice complied with the requirements of the contract. The adjudicator held that it did not because the notice had not incorporated the basis of the claimant's assessment, which had been sent to the defendant five days previously. Coulson J stated that the interpretation of pay less notices must be approached objectively and that the important question to answer was how a reasonable recipient would have understood the notice. He also added that the court would be "unimpressed by nice points of textual analysis" and that one way of "testing to see whether the contents of the notice are adequate is to see if the notice provides an adequate agenda for a dispute about valuation and/or any cross-claims available to the employer".

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more