We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Development project – rights to light – highhanded conduct – consequences

Commercial Leases

Development project – rights to light – highhanded conduct – consequences

Ottercroft Limited v Scandia Care Limited & another [2016] EWCA Civ 867 (6 July 2016)


This is another case where the lead judgment was given by Lewsion LJ and it demonstrates the Court of Appeal’s current attitude to high-handed strategies of developers. Following the decision in HXRUK II (CHC) Ltd v Heaney [2010] EWHC 2245 (Ch) developers were at risk of a mandatory injunction rather than simply an award of damages against them, where a right to light has been infringed and so many tended to proceed with caution. The industry took hope for more flexibility following the Supreme Court decision in Coventry v Lawrence (T/A Fen Tigers) [2014] UKSC 13. Here the Court of Appeal let its views be known where a developer acts in a high-handed manner.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more