We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

COSTAIN LTD v TARMAC HOLDINGS LTD

Lloyd's Law Reports Plus

COSTAIN LTD v TARMAC HOLDINGS LTD

[2017] Lloyd's Rep. Plus 30

QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION (TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT)

Before Mr Justice Coulson

Arbitration – Stay of proceedings – Whether there was a valid arbitration clause and a dispute within the clause – Whether clause was incapable of being performed by reason of abandonment, repudiation or estoppel – Whether arbitration clause null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed – Arbitration Act 1996, section 9.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more