In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close

SCHENKER INTERNATIONAL (HK) LTD v NATURAL DAIRY (NZ) HOLDINGS LTD

Lloyd's Law Reporter

SCHENKER INTERNATIONAL (HK) LTD v NATURAL DAIRY (NZ) HOLDINGS LTD

Contract – Transport contract concluded – Whether wrong defendant

This was a dispute arising from a series of shipments of dairy products from New Zealand to China, arranged by the plaintiff logistics company on behalf of the CIF seller under a supply agreement. The agreements for the shipments had taken place through correspondence over time and the defendant denied being the right defendant, asserting that the parties to the supply contract were the right defendants to the various unpaid invoices. The judge found on the evidence that the parties had entered into carriage contracts with the defendant as a party. The change from CIF terms to Ex Works and then to FOB resulted in the defendant being responsible for ocean freight charges. The plaintiff's standard terms and conditions were conditions of the contract. The terms thereof were not particularly onerous.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more