In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close


Lloyd's Law Reporter


[2016] EWHC 2957 (Comm), Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court, Sir Jeremy Cooke, 17 November 2016

Contracts - Guarantee - Whether guarantee an on-demand guarantee - Importance of transactional context - Summary judgment

The claimant shipowners applied for summary judgment against the defendant in respect of sums alleged to be due under a Deed of Guarantee dated 16 May 2008. The Deed formed part of a financing transaction, essentially a sale-and-leaseback between the defendant and its group of companies and the owner and its banks whereby the ship was sold to the owner and demise-chartered back to W, a subsidiary of the defendant, under a Barecon 2001 charter dated 7 May 2008. The issue was whether or not the Deed constituted an "on-demand guarantee", payable on the certification of sums due by the owners, or whether, before liability could arise under the Deed, the owners must establish the liability for hire of W. On owners? argument, summary judgment should be made as no set-off was permitted on the terms of the guarantee. The defendant admitted that demands had been made, but denied that this was an on-demand guarantee, so that unless W was in breach of the charter, no sums were due.

The rest of this document is only available to online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?


Request a trial Find out more