We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Court of Appeal sets the bar high for frustration

Litigation Letter

Court of Appeal sets the bar high for frustration

Armchair Answercall Ltd v People In Mind Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 1039, 26 October 2016

It is infrequent that the Court is seized with a case about frustration, but that was the exact question faced by the Court of Appeal in this case. The background to the dispute was that Kendlebell Ltd was a franchise business offering telephone answering services. Armchair Answercall (AA) entered into a Services Agreement in July 2011 to take over the management of Kendlebell and transition Kendlebell’s franchisees into a new operational model. In September 2011, AA further entered into a Contractor Agreement with People In Mind (PIM) to advise on and support “the transition of operating model” under the Services Agreement. Unfortunately, it was clear by October 2011 that Kendlebell’s franchisees would not accept the new arrangement. AA thus argued that the Contractor Agreement had been frustrated.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more