We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

PAICE & ANOTHER v HARDING (TRADING AS MJ HARDING CONTRACTORS)

Construction Law Reporter

PAICE & ANOTHER v HARDING (TRADING AS MJ HARDING CONTRACTORS)

Adjudication - Whether decision of adjudicator reached too late - Apparent bias - Jurisdiction and severability

This is another round in the ongoing dispute between the parties which has resulted in a number of adjudications and litigation in the courts. The present case concerned the fifth adjudication between the parties in which the adjudicator decided that the defendant must pay to the claimants £296,006.44 by way of repayment of sums overpaid in respect of the works. The claimants sought to enforce the decision of the adjudicator but the defendant resisted enforcement on three grounds.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more