i-law

Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter

Japan Lines Ltd. v. Himoff Maritime Enterprises Ltd. (The Kehrea) - Q.B.D. (Com. Ct.) (Mustill J.) - 4 August 1982

Arbitration - Whether arbitration agreement frustrated by delay

The charterers of the vessel Kehrea applied to restrain the further conduct of an arbitration brought by the vessel’s owners on the ground that excessive delay in the conduct of the arbitration had brought the arbitration agreement to an end. Arbitrators were initially appointed in June 1974, but it was not until June 1975 that the owners delivered their points of claim. The pleadings exchanged in the arbitration raised three groups of issues, namely: (a) whether the owners had made representations in respect of the estimated time of the vessel’s arrival at the loading port, (b) whether there was a representation or an express or implied term in the charterparty to the effect that the vessel had sufficient bunkers onboard to complete the voyage, and whether the charterparty should be rectified, and (c) whether a particular clause in the charterparty made the charterers liable to pay for bunkers taken on-board at the intermediate port at the price which the owners’ had paid, or whether the price of the bunkers was fixed by another charterparty clause.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2026 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.