<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
	
	
	<rss 
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
     
     version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Shipping &amp; Trade Law RSS Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.i-law.com</link>
      <description>The latest content from  Shipping &amp; Trade Law</description>
      
		
		    <item>
         <title>BP Oil International Ltd v Target Shipping Ltd (The Target) [2013] EWCA Civ 196</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=321816</link>
         <description>BP Oil International Ltd v Target Shipping Ltd (The Target) [2013] EWCA Civ 196. BP Oil : the facts By entering</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 10:29:14 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=321816</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-05-09T10:29:14.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Braganza v BP Shipping Ltd and Another (The British Unity) [2013] EWCA Civ 230</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=321356</link>
         <description>Braganza v BP Shipping Ltd and Another (The British Unity) [2013] EWCA Civ 230. It is settled law that where</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:11:17 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=321356</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-04-26T12:11:17.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Charterers&#8217; failure to pay hire: owners&#8217; right to damages where the vessel is withdrawn</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=321355</link>
         <description>Charterers&#8217; failure to pay hire: owners&#8217; right to damages where the vessel is withdrawn. It is not controversial that breach</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:11:17 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=321355</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-04-26T12:11:17.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Standard Chartered Bank v Dorchester LNG (2) Ltd (The Erin Schulte) [2013] EWHC 808 (Comm)</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=321354</link>
         <description>Standard Chartered Bank v Dorchester LNG (2) Ltd (The Erin Schulte) [2013] EWHC 808 (Comm). The Erin Schulte: the factsThe</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:11:17 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=321354</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-04-26T12:11:17.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>The Golden Victory and assessment of damages in one off sale contracts</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320137</link>
         <description>The Golden Victory and assessment of damages in one off sale contracts. However, this breach date principle is not an</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320137</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T15:19:49.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Refcomp SpA v AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance SA Case C-543/10</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320136</link>
         <description>Refcomp SpA v AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance SA Case C-543/10. In Refcomp, a contract of sale containing a jurisdiction</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320136</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T15:19:49.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Dry Bulk Handy Holding Inc v Fayette International Holdings Ltd (The "Bulk Chile") [2013] EWCA Civ 184</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320135</link>
         <description>Dry Bulk Handy Holding Inc v Fayette International Holdings Ltd (The "Bulk Chile") [2013] EWCA Civ 184. In a case</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320135</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T15:19:49.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Proton Energy Group SA v Public Company Orlen Lietuva [2013] EWHC 334 (Comm)</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320134</link>
         <description>Proton Energy Group SA v Public Company Orlen Lietuva [2013] EWHC 334 (Comm). Proton: the facts Proton, the claimant, was</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:19:48 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320134</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T15:19:48.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Bunge SA v Nidera BV [2013] EWHC 84 (Comm)</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=318784</link>
         <description>Bunge SA v Nidera BV [2013] EWHC 84 (Comm). On 5 August 2010, the same day that a vessel was</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:12:19 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=318784</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-01T11:12:19.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Dalmare SpA v Union Maritime Ltd and Another (The &#8220;Union Power&#8221;) [2012] EWHC 3537 (Comm)</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=318783</link>
         <description>Dalmare SpA v Union Maritime Ltd and Another (The &#8220;Union Power&#8221;) [2012] EWHC 3537 (Comm). Dalmare: the facts By entering</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:12:19 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=318783</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-01T11:12:19.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>IMO and the challenge of sustainability</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=318782</link>
         <description>IMO and the challenge of sustainability. The slogan is in fact the proclaimed theme for this year&#8217;s World Maritime Day</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:12:19 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=318782</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-01T11:12:19.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NV v Cargill International SA (The "Global Santosh") 

[2013] EWHC 30 (Comm)</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=318781</link>
         <description>NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NV v Cargill International SA (The "Global Santosh") [2013] EWHC 30 (Comm). A time charterparty dated 11</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=318781</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-01T11:12:18.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Wuhan Ocean Economic &amp; Technical Cooperation Co Ltd and Another v Schiffahrts-Gesellschaft &#8220;Hansa Murcia&#8221; mbH &amp; Co KG [2012] EWHC 3104 (Comm)</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=317110</link>
         <description>Wuhan Ocean Economic &amp; Technical Cooperation Co Ltd and Another v Schiffahrts-Gesellschaft &#8220;Hansa Murcia&#8221; mbH &amp; Co KG [2012] EWHC 3104 (Comm).</description>
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:01:16 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=317110</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-01-28T13:01:16.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Breffka &amp; Hehnke GmbH &amp; Co KG and Others v Navire Shipping Co Ltd and Others (The &#8220;Saga Explorer&#8221;) [2012] EWHC 3124 (Comm)</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=317109</link>
         <description>Breffka &amp; Hehnke GmbH &amp; Co KG and Others v Navire Shipping Co Ltd and Others (The &#8220;Saga Explorer&#8221;) [2012] EWHC 3124</description>
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:01:16 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=317109</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-01-28T13:01:16.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>New laytime and demurrage considerations under sale contracts</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=317108</link>
         <description>New laytime and demurrage considerations under sale contracts. Is laytime to be suspended during unloading or otherwise? It is worth</description>
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:01:16 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=317108</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-01-28T13:01:16.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Must &#8220;control&#8221; of a ship be more than &#8220;control&#8221;?l</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=314850</link>
         <description>Must &#8220;control&#8221; of a ship be more than &#8220;control&#8221;?l. The conditions relating to in personam liabilityUnder section 21(4) of</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:11:43 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=314850</guid>
         <dc:date>2012-12-07T10:11:43.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>The &#8220;Bunga Melati5&#8221; [2012] SGCA 46</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=314849</link>
         <description>The &#8220;Bunga Melati5&#8221; [2012] SGCA 46. The Singapore Court of Appeal on 21 August 2012 handed down a judgment of</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:11:43 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=314849</guid>
         <dc:date>2012-12-07T10:11:43.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Amendment 121 and choice of court agreements</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=314848</link>
         <description>Amendment 121 and choice of court agreements. The main aim of the proposal and amendment is to facilitate the free</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:11:43 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=314848</guid>
         <dc:date>2012-12-07T10:11:43.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Bulk Ship Union SA v Clipper Bulk Shipping Ltd (The Pearl C) [2012] EWHC 2595 (Comm); [2012] 2 Lloyd&#8217;s Rep 533</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=314847</link>
         <description>Bulk Ship Union SA v Clipper Bulk Shipping Ltd (The Pearl C) [2012] EWHC 2595 (Comm); [2012] 2 Lloyd&#8217;s Rep</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:11:42 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=314847</guid>
         <dc:date>2012-12-07T10:11:42.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S v Beach Building &amp; Civil Group Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 696</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=312390</link>
         <description>Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S v Beach Building &amp; Civil Group Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 696. In a recent decision handed down</description>
         <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=312390</guid>
         <dc:date>2012-10-30T12:50:56.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		
	  </channel>
</rss>
