<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
	
	
	<rss 
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
     
     version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Insurance Law Monthly RSS Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.i-law.com</link>
      <description>The latest content from  Insurance Law Monthly</description>
      
		
		    <item>
         <title>Reinsurance: coverage and the running of time</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=321219</link>
         <description>Reinsurance: coverage and the running of time. The main interest of the decision is the implication that, under an excess</description>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=321219</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-04-24T16:09:27.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Property insurance: reinstatement</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320166</link>
         <description>Property insurance: reinstatement. A J Building and Plastering Ltd v Turner and Others [2013] EWHC 484 (QB) shows that, absent</description>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320166</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-04-24T16:09:27.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Brokers: duty of care</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320156</link>
         <description>Brokers: duty of care. Marchand: the factsDr and Mrs Marchand owned a farm in Tai Tapu, just outside Christchurch.</description>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320156</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-04-24T16:09:27.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Motor vehicle insurance: replacement vehicles</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320152</link>
         <description>Motor vehicle insurance: replacement vehicles. Singh: the factsOn 6 August 2009 a Rolls-Royce being driven by HS was involved in</description>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320152</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-04-24T16:09:27.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Reform of insurance law: the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320146</link>
         <description>Reform of insurance law: the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012. Scope of the ActThe Act will apply to</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320146</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-04-04T15:55:42.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Marine insurance: damage to cargo</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320170</link>
         <description>Marine insurance: damage to cargo. Alstom: the facts In June 2006 Compton Greaves Ltd of Mumbai, India, agreed to manufacture</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:08 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320170</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:08.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Reinsurance: conflict of laws</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320169</link>
         <description>Reinsurance: conflict of laws. The twist in Amlin was that the reinsurance contained a follow the settlements clause, meaning that</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:08 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320169</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:08.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Reinsurance: following settlements</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320168</link>
         <description>Reinsurance: following settlements. The point arose in the context of claims under a liability policy, the claims being settled when</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:07 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320168</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:07.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Financial Ombudsman Service: effect of a determination by FOS</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320167</link>
         <description>Financial Ombudsman Service: effect of a determination by FOS. The question in Clark and Another v In Focus Asset Management</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:07 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320167</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:07.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Marine insurance: loss of hire: non-disclosure and want of due diligence</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320165</link>
         <description>Marine insurance: loss of hire: non-disclosure and want of due diligence. The Court of Appeal has recently dismissed the insurers&#8217;</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:07 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320165</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:07.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Liability insurance: compulsory insurance for carriers of passengers by sea</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320164</link>
         <description>Liability insurance: compulsory insurance for carriers of passengers by sea. The Regulations require carriers or performing carriers of passengers by</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:07 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320164</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:07.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Directors&#8217; and officers&#8217; insurance: third party rights</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320163</link>
         <description>Directors&#8217; and officers&#8217; insurance: third party rights. It was commented that the decision struck a blow at the efficacy of</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:06 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320163</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:06.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Professional indemnity insurance: mitigation costs</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320162</link>
         <description>Professional indemnity insurance: mitigation costs. The Court of Appeal, upholding the first instance decision of Eder J, discussed in the</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:06 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320162</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:06.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Property insurance: measure of indemnity</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320160</link>
         <description>Property insurance: measure of indemnity. Turvey: the facts The claimant trustee was the assured under a policy which insured an</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:06 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320160</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:06.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Conflict of laws: declaratory relief</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320159</link>
         <description>Conflict of laws: declaratory relief. The Court of Appeal in ACE felt able to distinguish the earlier case and refused</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:06 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320159</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:06.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Insurance settlements: enforcement</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320158</link>
         <description>Insurance settlements: enforcement. The settlements were subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts. Three years after the settlement</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:05 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320158</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:05.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Brokers: liability for inadequate coverage</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320157</link>
         <description>Brokers: liability for inadequate coverage. The case confirms that a broker must act in accordance with the standards of a</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:05 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320157</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:05.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Before the event insurance: choice of lawyer</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320155</link>
         <description>Before the event insurance: choice of lawyer. In Brown-Quinn and Others v Equity Syndicate Management Ltd and Another [2012] EWCA</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:05 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320155</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:05.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Causation: proof of loss</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320154</link>
         <description>Causation: proof of loss. Popplewell J rejected the first suggestion but found on the facts that there was sufficient evidence</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:04 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320154</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:04.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		    <item>
         <title>Regulation of insurance: breakdown cover for electronic equipment</title>
         <link>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320153</link>
         <description>Regulation of insurance: breakdown cover for electronic equipment. Digital Satellite Warranty: the facts Under section 19 of the Financial Services</description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:04 GMT</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=320153</guid>
         <dc:date>2013-03-28T16:37:04.0Z</dc:date>
      </item>
		
	  </channel>
</rss>
