Customer support: +44 (0)20 7017 7701 Technical Support: +44 (0) 20 7017 4161

Related Content

Publication Details
Building Law Monthly
ISSUE: Vol 19 No 11
ISBN: 0957-0628

01 Nov 2002Building Law Monthly

PRE-CONTRACTUAL NEGOTIATIONS INADMISSIBLE

Canterbury Golf International Ltd v Yoshimoto [2002] UKPC 40

In our January 2002 issue (at pp.5–8), in the context of a discussion of the decision of the Court of Appeal of Singapore in Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1933 v Liang Huat Aluminium Ltd [2001] BLR 351 , we discussed the extent to which evidence of pre-contractual negotiations is admissible in evidence when interpreting a contract. The Privy Council in Canterbury Golf International Ltd v Yoshimoto [2002] UKPC 40 has re-affirmed the general rule that evidence of pre-contractual negotiations is not generally admissible.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Username:
Password:
Email address:
Remember my details on this computer:

If you are not already a subscriber, please select one of the options below.

Sign up for a free trial or for further assistance call your Account Manager or our Customer support: +44 (0)20 7017 7701 Technical Support: +44 (0) 20 7017 4161 .