i-law

Construction Law Reporter

BARHALE LTD V SP TRANSMISSION PLC

Adjudication – Failure to exhaust jurisdiction – Whether failure to consider a possible defence must be deliberate in order to amount to a failure to exhaust jurisdiction

The pursuer brought an action in order to enforce the decision of the adjudicator. The defender resisted enforcement on the ground that the adjudicator had failed to exhaust his jurisdiction and had failed to give adequate reasons for his decision. It was held that the pursuer was not entitled to enforce the decision as he the adjudicator had failed to exhaust his jurisdiction. This being the case, it was not necessary to decide whether the adjudicator had failed to give adequate reasons for his decision.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.