01 Jun 2007Intellectual Property Decisions

30040 Nokia Corp v InterDigital Technology Corp

Patents Court (Pumfrey J, 4 May 2007) application by claimant to amend its statement of case on non-essentiality of defendant’s patents to meet 3G standard – addition of contentions why defendant’s patents were not essential – lack of assistance from defendant to its advisers – impact on proceedings – amendment allowed subject to timetable ([2007] EWHC 1076 (Pat))

Mr R Meade and Mr J Abrahams (Bird & Bird) for the claimant (Nokia); Mr G Pritchard (Wragge & Co) for the defendant (InterDigital).

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

If you are not already a subscriber, please select one of the options below.

Sign up for a free trial or for further assistance call your Account Manager or our Customer support: +44 (0)20 7017 7701 Technical Support: +44 (0) 20 7017 4161 .


Username:
Password:
Email address:
Log in Remember my details on this computer:

Related Content

01 Jun 2007Intellectual Property Decisions

30040 Nokia Corp v InterDigital Technology Corp