i-law

Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly

The Human Rights Act and business: friend or foe?

Conor A Gearty * and John Phillips **

Prior to the introduction of the Human Rights Act 1998 there were those who predicted with some trepidation that the Act would have adverse, perhaps dire, consequences for business. Twelve years after the commencement of the Act, this article examines whether those fears were justified. Key requirements of business are identified, and the impact of the Act (in respect of its influences on both public and private law) is assessed in relation to those requirements. The conclusion is that in general the Human Rights Act has not been detrimental to business and, perhaps more surprisingly, that sometimes it has led to identifiable advantages for that sector.

A. INTRODUCTION

The Human Rights Act (“HRA”) received the Royal Assent on 9 November 1998. It was one of the earliest manifesto commitments to be delivered by the then new Labour Government, and would have been earlier still had it not been for the intervention of other, more pressing, Parliamentary business. As the idea of human rights made its way from political theatre to enacted law, so it found itself scrutinised by a range of parties whose interest in the term had up to then been either tokenistic or non-existent. Into the latter camp fell the world of business, populated by actors for whom the acronym HR conjured up the hiring and firing of people, not the search to make their lives better. So, when Government delayed the date for the measure’s implementation in order to prepare the public sector for the rights revolution it had seemingly almost accidentally wrought,1 the business community went about its own due diligence, half scared, half excited about what lay in store.
By the time of its enactment, everybody had become aware that the HRA was no ordinary Act of Parliament. Its embedding in UK law of the general rights to be found in the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)2, its partial mapping into UK law of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”),3 and its insistence that all laws henceforth be interpreted consistently with such rights so far as this was “possible” to do,4 amounted to a break with a long British tradition of highly particularist


LLOYD’S MARITIME AND COMMERCIAL LAW QUARTERLY

488

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.