In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
To find out more about the way Informa Law uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page. Close

Private investigators, public traps

Fraud Intelligence

Private investigators, public traps

Private investigators may be useful for obtaining vital evidence but they need to be carefully managed, warn Andrew Keltie and Nina Moffat of Baker & McKenzie. A salutary example is Hewlett-Packard – the world’s largest PC manufacturer was caught up in a scandal involving boardroom leaks and ‘pretexting’ – while London law firm Mischon de Reya experienced negative publicity following the case of Hughes v Carratu International plc [2006] EWHC 1791.

Criminal sanctions under the Data Protection Act 1998 Pretexting “Pretexting” is the practice of obtaining personal data, such as account information and credit reports, from organisations under false pretences, often by impersonating the target individual. It is a criminal offence under section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) to unlawfully obtain personal data without proper consent. The concern for law firms and other employers of private investigators is that criminal liability under this section extends to those instructing the investigators as they may be considered to be a data controller under the DPA.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more