Litigation Letter
Claims by surviving spouses
Recent Court of Appeal judgments have underlined the impact of
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596 (HL) upon a surviving spouse claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
In an article in the
Family Law Journal for October, Sidney Ross of 11 Stone Buildings highlighted the key points. The article examined the effect of the decision
of the House of Lords in
White on the way in which courts have dealt with claims by surviving spouses under the Inheritance Act. Because s3(2) of the Act
(referred to in the article as the ‘notional divorce’ provision) directs the court to have regard to the provision that the
applicant might reasonably have expected to receive if, on the day on which the deceased died, the marriage, instead of being
terminated by death, had been terminated by a decree of divorce, the matrimonial case law is to some extent relevant. Is the
notional divorce element ‘merely one of the factors to which the court is to ‘have regard’ as in Re
Besterman [1984] ChD 458 CA or did it mean, as in
Moody v Stevenson [1992] ChD 486 CA, ‘that the acceptable minimum posthumous provision for a surviving spouse should correspond as closely
as possible to the inchoate rights enjoyed by that spouse in the deceased’s lifetime by virtue of his or her prospective entitlement
under the matrimonial law’? In
Re Jessop [1992] 1 FLR 591 CA the Court of Appeal declared in favour of the
Besterman approach. According to the author, any hope that a consistent approach for surviving spouse claims might be achieved was
dashed by the decision in
White. After considering the most recent judgments, the author concluded that they have clarified the implications of
White for 1975 Act claims, and have reiterated the necessity to give proper weight to all the relevant statutory matters, rather
than affording primacy to the outcome of the ‘notional divorce’ exercise and that we may hope for a more uniform and predictable
approach to claims by surviving spouses and, in due course, civil partners.