i-law

Lloyd's Law Reports

BURRARD INLET TUNNEL & BRIDGE COMPANY v. "EURANA" (OWNERS).

(1931) 39 Ll.L.Rep. 309

JUDICIAL COMMITTEEOF THE PRIVY COUNCIL.

Before Lord Merrivale, Lord Atkin, Lord Russell of Killowen, Lord Macmillan and Sir Lancelot Sanderson.

Public nuisance-Interference with navigation -Erection of bridge over Second Narrows, Vancouver Harbour - Collision between steamship and bridge- Damage to steamship and to bridge- Claim and counterclaim - Finding of lower Courts that the collision was an inevitable accident; that the bridge was an interference with navigation, but that the bridge, as erected, was authorised by statute -Claim and counterclaim dismissed - Burrard Inlet Tunnel & Bridge Company Act, 9 & 10 Edward VII, cap. 74-Railway Act (Revised Statutes of Canada, 1927, cap. 170)- Construction-

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.