i-law

Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly

WHAT ASSIGNMENTS OF CAUSES OF ACTION ARE, AND MORE

Offer-Hoar v. Larkstore

Much academic ink has been spilt over the speeches of the House of Lords in Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v. Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd 1 and its sequel, Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v. Panatown Ltd .2 Seemingly none, however, has been spent so far on the Court of Appeal’s decision in Offer-Hoar v. Larkstore Ltd (Technotrade Ltd, Part 20 defendant) .3 While Offer-Hoar is not concerned with the “black-hole” conundrum that so exercised their Lordships in Linden Gardens and Panatown , its clarification as to what precisely passes by a legal assignment of a cause of action may have wider implications on certain other developments hinted at in cases as diverse as Barbados Trust Co Ltd v. Bank of Zambia 4 and Golden Strait Corp v. Nippon Y.K.K. (“The Golden Victory”) .5
The claimants in Offer-Hoar owned land adjacent to a building site undergoing residential development owned by the first defendants, Larkstore Ltd (“L”). L acquired the site with all necessary planning and building consents from Starglade Ltd (“S”) on 21 June 1999. To obtain these consents, S had engaged Technotrade Ltd (“T”) to produce a soil investigation report on the site. The contract of engagement did not provide for any restriction on assignment, and the report, dated 14 December 1998, duly came into L’s possession. Without T’s consent, L used the report as part of its contract documentation with the second defendants, Bess Ltd (“B”) (who were engaged to carry out works on the site) and to obtain planning permission from the local council for a further phase of development. On 13 October 2001, a landslip occurred while works were ongoing, damaging the claimants’ adjacent properties. Alleging that the landslip was caused by L’s development of the site, the claimants commenced proceedings against L and B on 25 March 2003. B being insolvent, L brought Part 20 proceedings against T on 6 October 2004 for an indemnity under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978, alleging that T’s report had been prepared in breach of its obligations in tort6 and in contract. To surmount


CASE AND COMMENT

287

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.