i-law

Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter

Conclusion

The judge found that the fault of Captain K. and his staff was not “actual fault” of Polsteam. They were not the directing mind of the company, either in practice or under the company’s constitution. Although it was not necessary for his decision, Staughton J. would have been prepared to hold, if it were relevant, that fault on the part of Mr. G. (Director of TIAD) was actual fault on the part of Polsteam. However, neither the Director-General nor Mr. G. were at fault in the present case. They did what it was reasonable for the owner of a hundred ships to do; first, to appreciate the navigational problems posed by the use of radar in fog; secondly, to impress the urgency of such problems upon the masters of their ships; and thirdly to take steps to ensure, as far as they reasonably could, that their ships were safely navigated in fog. Declaration that Polsteam was entitled to limit its liability.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.