The effects of a follow the settlements clause in a reinsurance contract are well known. The clause removes the need for the reinsured to prove actual liability at law to the assured. Instead, it suffices..
There is very little authority on the scope of a broker’s duty of care after the insurance contract has been effected by him. The point arose in
Great North Eastern Railway Ltd v JLT Corporate..
Clause 5.1(e) of the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) Uninsured Drivers’ Agreement 1999 removes the liability of the MIB to indemnify a passenger where that passenger knew or ought to have known that the driver was..
In
Shinedean Ltd v (1) Alldown Demolition (London) Ltd (2) AXA Insurance UK plc [2005] EWHC 2319 (TCC) HHJ Richard Havery QC cast doubt on the efficacy of claims cooperation clauses, the Court holding that..
In Insurance Law Monthly (Volume 18: May (pp3–7)) there was detailed discussion of the decision of Cooke J in
Talbot Underwriting v Nausch Hogan & Murray, The Jascon 5 [2005] EWHC 2359 (Comm). The outcome..
Diab v Regent Insurance Co Ltd, June 2006, unreported a decision of the Privy Council on appeal from Belize, raised a number of important issues on the effect of the failure of the assured to..
Lloyd's and the Lloyd's Crest are trademarks of the Society incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871
by the name of Lloyd's
In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies. To find out more about the way www.i-law.com uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page.
By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies.