Print Editions

View print editions
for 2002

Vol 19 No 1

Vol 19 No 2

Vol 19 No 3

Vol 19 No 4

Vol 19 No 5

Vol 19 No 6

Vol 19 No 7

Vol 19 No 8

Vol 19 No 9

Vol 19 No 10

Vol 19 No 11

Vol 19 No 12

Key

@ - Online Only

# - Appeared in print edition

- Click to download the issue as a PDF file

Building Law Monthly

Browse Archive by Year

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Browse 2002 Archive by Month

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Articles for February 2002

PARTY TO AN ADJUDICATION CANNOT BOTH APPROBATE AND REPROBATE THE ADJUDICATOR’s DECISION #

01 February 2002

Shimizu Europe Ltd v Automajor Limited (unreported, Technology and Construction Court, 17 January 2002)

‘DECISION’ OF ADJUDICATOR THAT HE WAS UNABLE TO DECIDE A NULLITY #

01 February 2002

Ballast plc v The Burrell Company (Construction Management) Ltd [2001] BLR 529

SECTION 111 NOTICE REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY TO A DEFENDER WHO DISPUTES THAT THE SUM CLAIMED IS CONTRACTUALLY DUE #

01 February 2002

SL Timber Systems Ltd v Carillion Construction Ltd [2001] BLR 516

Lloyd's and the Lloyd's Crest are trademarks of the Society incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's

Terms and Conditions | Copyright | Contact | Trial/Subscribe

In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies. To find out more about the way www.i-law.com uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page.

By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies.