You are here:
Print Editions
View print editions
for 2001
for 2001
Key
@ - Online Only
# - Appeared in print edition
- Click to download the issue as a PDF file
Intellectual Property Decisions
Browse Archive by Year
Browse 2001 Archive by Month
Articles for June 2001
24036 Scholes Windows Limited v Magnet Limited
#
01 June 2001
Mr M Silverleaf QC (Lupton Fawcett) for the appellant; Mr A Watson QC and Mr C Birss (Martineau Johnson) for the respondent.
Per Mummery LJ (all concurring):
Background
The claimant (‘Scholes’)
appealed against the High Court decision (5..
24037 Arsenal Football Club plc v Matthew Reed
#
01 June 2001
Mr S Thorley QC and Mr T Mitcheson (Lawrence Jones) for the claimant; Mr A Roughton and Mr Malynicz (Stunt & Son) for the defendant.
Background
The claimant (‘AFC’)
had been associated with two signs, namely a..
24038 Network Multimedia Television Ltd v Jobserve Ltd
#
01 June 2001
Mr A Macnab for the claimant; Mr N Khan for the defendant.
Background
The claimant was a publishing company specialising in IT services, especially the provision of business information services over the internet. The defendant supplied advertising..
24039 Network Multimedia Television Limited (t/a Silicon.com) v Jobserve Limited
#
01 June 2001
Mr A Macnab (The Simkins Partnership) for the claimant; Mr N Khan (Wollastons) for the defendant.
Background
This was the restored hearing of the applications for continuation/discharge of the injunction, following Neuberger J’s decision (see the preceding..
24040 Hoya Corporation/Allergan Medical Optics
#
01 June 2001
M R Hutchins (Allergan Medical Optics) for the appellant opponent; Dr B Hansen (Hoya Corporation) for the respondent proprietor.
Background
The patent had been granted for an intra-ocular lens (‘IOL’)
with an optic or optic and haptic..
24041 Taurus-Film GmbH & Co v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM)
#
01 June 2001
R Schneider (M Loesch) for the appellant applicant; D Schennen and S Bonne (C Gómez de la Cruz) for OHIM.
Background
The office had refused the application to register CINE COMEDY in Classes 9, 16, 38, 41..
24035 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v (1) Baker Norton Pharmaceuticals Inc (2) Napro Biotherapeutics Inc
#
01 June 2001
Per Aldous LJ (all concurring):
Background
Bristol Meyers had claimed that their European Patent had been infringed but the court had upheld the defendants counterclaim for revocation. The judge ordered Bristol Myers to pay both defendants’ costs..
Lloyd's and the Lloyd's Crest are trademarks of the Society incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871
by the name of Lloyd's
