Mr A Waugh QC and Mr A Speck (Stringer Saul) for the appellant petitioner; Mr R Henderson QC and Mr D Alexander (Herbert Smith) for the respondent.
per
The Lord Chief Justice, giving judgment of the..
Mr A Watson QC and Mr T Mitcheson (Bristows) for the claimant; Mr S Thorley QC and Mr C Birss (Simmons & Simmons) for the defendants.
Background
Prior to the Patents Act 1977, a patentee seeking to..
Mr D Alexander for the Patent Office; Dr Kenneth Prendergast appeared in person.
Background
The applicant appealed against the Hearing Officer’s refusal to grant four patent applications on the grounds that there was inadequate support for the..
Representation not quoted.
Background
The applicant appealed against the decision of the Examining Division refusing the application on obviousness grounds in relation to claim 1 and its subordinate claims 2 to 12.
The invention was directed to a..
Representation not quoted.
Background
The applicant appealed against the decision of the Examining Division refusing the application for lack of inventive step over D1 in that the lubricants claimed in the application were merely a selection from..
Mr M Silverleaf QC and Mr R Arnold (Clifford Chance) for the claimants; Mr M Vanhegan (Blakesley Rice MacDonald) for the defendants.
Background
The claimants, having lost their breach of confidence action, did not accept that they..
Mr J Baldwin QC (Russells) for the claimants; Mr N Merriman QC (Fox Williams) for the fourth defendant; the remaining defendants did not appear and were not represented.
Background
Mr Young, the fourth defendant in a copyright..
Mr C Morcom QC (Bristows) for Gillette, the appellant in the second opposition and the respondent in the first; Mr G Burkill (Needham & Grant) for Wisdom, the appellant in the first opposition and the..
Miss J Jones (Sherringtons) for the claimant; Mr J Graham (Collyer-Bristow) for the defendants.
Background
Beautimatic was the registered proprietor of the mark LEXUS for ‘soaps, perfumes, toilet preparations; essential oils; cosmetics; hair lotions; all included in..
Mr G Hobbs QC (Denton Hall) for the applicant; Mr J Mellor (Linklaters & Paines) for the opponent.
Background
The applicant (‘CEH’
) appealed against the Registrar’s decision (17 August 1998) upholding the provisional registration granted in Part..
Mr P Charlton (Elkington & Fife) for the applicants; Mr D Harrison (Mewburn Ellis) for the opponents.
Background
The applicants applied to register the mark shown below in respect of a whole range of goods relating to..
Mr M Edenborough (Mewburn Ellis) for the respondent; the appellant did not appear and was not represented.
Background
The opponents had appealed against the Registrar’s decision (24 November 1998) giving leave for the applicant to file evidence..
Lloyd's and the Lloyd's Crest are trademarks of the Society incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871
by the name of Lloyd's
In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies. To find out more about the way www.i-law.com uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page.
By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies.