Ms Anna Edwards-Stuart (Jensen & Son) for the defendants/applicants (Charles Ifejika); Mr George Hamer (McDaniel & Co) for the claimant/respondent (Victor Ifejika).
Background
This case concerned an amended application by the defendant for summary judgment in an..
Mr Simon Thorley QC and Mr Joe Delaney (Rouse Legal) for the claimants (Diageo); Mr Roger Wyand QC and Mr Simon Malynicz (Pinsent Masons) for the defendants (ICB).
Background
Last month’s issue of Intellectual Property Decisions (see..
Mr Colin Birss QC and Mr Miles Copeland (Rouse Legal) for the appellant (Medeva); Mr Thomas Mitcheson (the Treasury Solicitor) for the respondent (The Comptroller)
Background
Medeva appealed against the decision of the Hearing Officer, dated 16..
Mr Colin Birss QC and Mr Douglas Campbell (Bird & Bird LLP) for the claimants (Gemstar); Mr James Mellor QC and Mr Andrew Lykiardopoulos (Simmons & Simmons) for the defendants (Virgin).
Background
The claimants (collectively Gemstar) claimed..
Mr Richard Meade QC and Mr Henry Ward (DLA Piper UK LLP) for the appellant (Virgin); Mr Mark Vanhegan QC and Miss Kathryn Pickard (Wragge and Co LLP) for the respondent (Contour).
Per Lord Justice Jacob..
Mr Mark Platts-Mills QC and Mr James Whyte (Field Fisher Waterhouse) for the claimants (VF); Mr George Hamer (McGuireWoods) for the defendants (Bestnet).
Background
Mr Justice Arnold had held that the claimants, collectively Vestergaard Frandsen (VF), had..
Mr Tim Powell (Powell Gilbert LLP) for the claimant/part 20 defendant (Mobiqa); Mr Brian Nicholson (Fox Williams) for the defendant/part 20 claimant (Trinity).
Background
The claimant patentee, Mobiqa, had served a notice of discontinuance, leaving the court..
Mr Ian Purvis QC (Pinsent Masons) for the claimants (NAC); Mr Mark Engelman (Norton Rose) for the first defendant (SREL) and (by Robert Brand & Co) for the second defendant (Mr Riley).
Background
This case concerns allegations..
S O Gillert and F Schiwek (Rechtsanwälte) for the appellant (Audi); G Schneider (acting as agent) for the defendant (OHIM).
Background
Audi’s application to register the word mark ‘Vorsprung durch Technik’ had been refused by the examiner..
Mr Michael Bloch QC and Mr Alan Bryson (Harbottle Lewis) for the appellants/claimants (Lucasfilm); Mr Alastair Wilson QC and Mr George Hamer (Simmons Cooper Andrew LLP) for the respondents/defendants.
Per Lord Justice Jacob (all concurring):
Background
This is..
Mr Thomas Mitcheson (Powell Gilbert LLP) for the claimants (Hospira); Mr Thomas Hinchliffe (McDermott Will & Emery UK LLP) for the defendant (Amgen).
Background
This was a case management conference concerned with disclosure. The claimants, collectively Hospira,..
Mr Colin Birss QC and Mr Douglas Campbell (Bird & Bird LLP) for the claimants (Gemstar); Mr James Mellor QC and Mr Andrew Lykiardopoulos (Simmons & Simmons) for the defendants (Virgin).
Background
The defendants, Virgin, having succeeded..
Lloyd's and the Lloyd's Crest are trademarks of the Society incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871
by the name of Lloyd's
In order to deliver a personalised, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies. To find out more about the way www.i-law.com uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page.
By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies.